🔥Recent on-chain trading terminal $Genius @GeniusTerminal trading volume is mainly concentrated on the BSC chain, while Solana ecosystem trading volume share is notably lower, showing obvious cross-chain differentiation.

📚According to public data:
2026-03-09 (weekly data)
EVM trading volume: $556,916,284
Solana trading volume: $22,537,044
Total trading volume: $579,453,328
2026-03-14 (daily data)
EVM trading volume: $146,789,414
Solana trading volume: $6,836,838
Total trading volume: $153,626,252
✨Due to the project's airdrop activity distributing a fixed 10 million points weekly, based on trading volume calculations from recent weeks, the average cost per point is $0.03-0.08 (allocation weight varies with different trading volumes)
From a structural perspective:
EVM (primarily BSC) trading volume accounts for approximately 95%
Solana trading volume accounts for only approximately 4%-5%
This indicates that $Genius 's current core liquidity almost entirely comes from the EVM ecosystem, especially BSC users, while Solana users still contribute very limited trading depth.
From a market structure perspective, this phenomenon may be related to several factors:
Apart from CZ as project advisor and Yzhilabs investments creating great expectations for traders:
1️⃣ BSC users are more sensitive to high-frequency trading and airdrop activities
BSC has always been one of the most active public chains in the on-chain "volume farming ecosystem," with users showing high participation in trading incentives and airdrop activities.
2️⃣ EVM wallet and fund migration is more convenient
A large amount of DeFi funds are already within the EVM ecosystem, with lower costs to migrate to Genius.
3️⃣ Solana ecosystem users' habits concentrate on native DEXs
Platforms like Jupiter and Raydium have already formed strong liquidity, making it difficult for new trading platforms to quickly capture market share.
Genius's trading volume appears to be cross-chain, but is actually still a "BSC-driven platform."