#Gate广场五月交易分享

What does the liquidity exhaustion in Bitcoin spot markets indicate?

On April 30th, Bitcoin’s daily trading volume fell below $8 billion, hitting a new low since October 2023, shrinking nearly 70% from the February high. Under low liquidity, market depth sharply declines, and small funds can trigger intense volatility. Is this a market bottom signal of “price and volume at the bottom”? Or a prelude to a decline caused by insufficient funds? Let’s take a look.

1. Sudden Drop in Market Depth Amplifies Volatility

Direct signs of liquidity exhaustion

Currently, daily trading volume is less than $8 billion, nearly 70% below the February peak, and market depth (the buy and sell orders within a 2% price range) has significantly contracted. According to Glassnode data, in this environment, a few large orders (such as institutional rebalancing or leverage liquidations) can cause drastic price swings. For example, during the on-chain activity freeze in March 2025, the market experienced a single-day drop of over 7% due to insufficient liquidity.

Hidden risks of divergence between options market and spot

Although Volmex’s BVIV index shows 30-day implied volatility dropping below an annualized 42% (a three-month low), the shrinking spot trading volume may not be fully priced into options markets. If the Federal Reserve signals a hawkish stance (such as delaying rate cuts or strengthening rate hike expectations), the spot market could “flash crash” due to liquidity shortages, while options markets may react with lag, increasing volatility.

2. Diverging Capital Flows Increase Market Uncertainty

Institutional Funds: Short-term Redemptions and Long-term Accumulation Coexist

Redemption pressure: After Bitcoin’s price fell from a high of $126k in early 2026, some institutions redeemed ETF shares to lock in profits or for risk control reasons. For example, during the correction, spot ETFs triggered “mechanical redemptions,” leading to passive selling and draining depth from the order book.

Long-term confidence: Despite a 50% price decline, ETF assets under management only decreased by 7%, indicating institutions have not sold off massively. Fidelity data shows that in April 2026, investor funds rotated from gold back into Bitcoin, reversing the trend at the end of 2025, suggesting ongoing confidence in long-term value.

Retail Funds: Purchase Power Gaps and Stock Game

After the 2025 bull market, retail investors faced a purchase power gap above $120k, with no fresh fiat entering the ecosystem, leading to a “stock game” with existing funds. Under low liquidity, retail panic selling could be exploited by institutions through low-price accumulation, further controlling the market.

3. Macro Policies and Market Sentiment Interplay

Key Role of Federal Reserve Policies

Bitcoin’s price is highly correlated with global macro liquidity. Currently, markets generally expect the Fed to keep rates unchanged in the short term, with rate cut expectations delayed until late 2026. If rate cuts occur, the opportunity cost of holding Bitcoin decreases, prompting funds to rotate from money market funds into risk assets; conversely, hawkish signals suppress risk assets, accelerating Bitcoin’s decline due to liquidity shortages.

Uncertainty in Regulatory Policies

By 2026, global crypto regulation shows polarization: the EU’s MiCA law is fully implemented, the US discusses the “Digital Asset Market Structure Act,” and the UAE launches a “Crypto Free Zone.” Policy uncertainties after the US elections (such as tightening taxes/regulations on ETFs) could trigger short-term market volatility, further weakening liquidity.

4. Historical Cases and Future Outlook

Risks of Repeating Historical Patterns

In the 2018 bear market, on-chain activity sharply declined, followed by prolonged price declines. The current environment of low on-chain activity and liquidity exhaustion resembles that of past bear markets. If market sentiment does not recover, prices could fall further.

Buffering Role of Institutionalization

However, unlike 2018, nearly 60% of Bitcoin supply is held by long-term holders, and ETFs hold about 6.1% of the total supply. Institutional dominance could enhance stability and prevent disorderly price drops. For example, in April 2026, Bitcoin ETFs recorded a single-day net inflow, ending five months of outflows, indicating ongoing institutional support. $BTC $ETH $DOGE