📢 Gate Square #MBG Posting Challenge# is Live— Post for MBG Rewards!
Want a share of 1,000 MBG? Get involved now—show your insights and real participation to become an MBG promoter!
💰 20 top posts will each win 50 MBG!
How to Participate:
1️⃣ Research the MBG project
Share your in-depth views on MBG’s fundamentals, community governance, development goals, and tokenomics, etc.
2️⃣ Join and share your real experience
Take part in MBG activities (CandyDrop, Launchpool, or spot trading), and post your screenshots, earnings, or step-by-step tutorials. Content can include profits, beginner-friendl
The Trilemma of Stablecoins Reshaped: Analysis of Decentralization Decline and Emerging Trends
Rethinking the Trilemma of Stablecoins: The Decline of Decentralization
Stablecoins have always been a hot topic in the cryptocurrency space. As one of the few applications that have found a clear product-market fit in the crypto world, the importance of stablecoins is self-evident. Currently, the industry generally expects that tens of trillions of dollars in stablecoins will flow into traditional financial markets in the next five years. However, not all that glitters is gold.
The Evolution of the Stablecoin Trilemma
The three dilemmas initially faced in the stablecoin sector include:
However, after multiple controversial experiments, scalability remains a significant challenge. This has prompted the industry to reassess these concepts to adapt to the new reality.
Recent positioning maps of some major stablecoin projects show that Decentralization has been replaced by "censorship resistance". Although censorship resistance is one of the fundamental characteristics of cryptocurrencies, it is merely a subset of Decentralization. In fact, with few exceptions, most emerging stablecoins exhibit certain degrees of centralization characteristics.
For example, even if these projects utilize decentralized exchanges, there is still a team responsible for managing strategies, seeking profits, and redistributing them to holders similar to shareholders. In this case, scalability comes from the scale of profits, rather than the composability within DeFi.
True Decentralization has faced setbacks.
Decentralization Dilemma
On March 12, 2020, the market crash triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic exposed the vulnerabilities of decentralized stablecoins like DAI. Subsequently, reserves shifted primarily towards USDC, which to some extent acknowledged the failure of decentralization in a market dominated by Circle and Tether. At the same time, attempts at algorithmic stablecoins like UST or rebase stablecoins like Ampleforth also failed to achieve the expected results. The tightening of the regulatory environment further exacerbated this trend. The rise of institutional stablecoins has also weakened the development space for experimental projects.
Against this background, Liquity stands out for its contract immutability and the use of Ethereum as collateral, representing a pure attempt at Decentralization. However, its scalability still needs improvement. The recently launched V2 version enhances peg security through multiple upgrades and offers more flexible interest rate options when minting the new stablecoin BOLD.
Nevertheless, Liquity's growth still faces some limiting factors. Compared to the capital-efficient but non-yielding USDT and USDC, its stablecoin's loan-to-value ratio of (LTV) is about 90%, which does not offer a clear advantage. In addition, direct competitors providing intrinsic yield, such as Ethena, Usual, and Resolv, have reached an LTV of 100%.
More importantly, Liquity may lack a large-scale distribution model. It still primarily relies on the early Ethereum community, with less focus on use cases such as diffusion on DEXs. While its cyberpunk atmosphere aligns with the spirit of cryptocurrency, it could limit its mainstream growth if it cannot strike a balance with DeFi or retail adoption.
Emerging Trends and Challenges
The introduction of the "Genius Act" in the United States may bring more stability and recognition to the country's stablecoin, but the bill mainly focuses on licensed and regulated entities issuing traditional, fiat-backed stablecoins. This means that decentralized, crypto-collateralized, or algorithmic stablecoins may fall into a regulatory gray area or be excluded.
Currently, there are various types of stablecoin projects emerging in the market:
The commonality among these projects is varying degrees of centralization. Even projects focused on DeFi, such as Delta-Neutral strategies, are managed by internal teams. While they may leverage Ethereum in the background, the overall management remains centralized.
Emerging ecosystems such as MegaETH and HyperEVM have also brought new hope. For example, the CapMoney project aims to gradually achieve Decentralization through the economic security provided by Eigen Layer. In addition, fork projects of Liquity such as Felix Protocol have seen significant growth on the new chain.
These projects choose to focus on distribution models centered around emerging blockchains, leveraging the advantages of the "novelty effect."
Conclusion
Centralization is not entirely negative. For projects, it is simpler, more controllable, scalable, and easier to adapt to regulatory requirements. However, this contradicts the original spirit of cryptocurrency. No centralized stablecoin can truly guarantee censorship resistance and complete control over user assets.
Therefore, despite the appeal of emerging alternatives, we should not forget the original stablecoin trilemma: price stability, Decentralization, and capital efficiency. While pursuing innovation and adaptability, it remains crucial to maintain focus on these core principles.