Recently, a message has been circulating within the Chain Community: the slider verification mechanism used by the Alpha project in the verification stage has been successfully breached by certain studios. This incident has sparked heated discussions about the security of blockchain projects.



In fact, whether it is facial recognition or slider verification, these technical means are difficult to completely resist attacks from professional programmers. With the continuous advancement of technology, various verification methods will eventually be breached, which seems to be an unsolvable problem.

However, what can truly solve the issue of fairness may not be technical means, but rather economic means. Even if a studio possesses advanced technology, implementing a reasonable economic incentive mechanism can ensure that the cost of scoring for all participants is roughly the same. Therefore, by setting threshold scores for the first and second phases, even if the thresholds are slightly higher, fairness can be largely guaranteed.

This concept aligns with the college entrance examination system in the traditional education field. For many years, the college entrance examination has used scores as a standard for evaluation, precisely because it can measure students' abilities relatively fairly.

In the design of blockchain projects, we might be able to draw on this concept. By implementing a reasonable economic incentive mechanism, combined with appropriate technological means, we can ensure the security of the project while also guaranteeing fair competition among participants. This balance may be the key to the future development of blockchain projects.
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForkTroopervip
· 08-03 03:13
It's a common issue: wanting both protection and efficiency.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHuntervip
· 08-02 05:23
It's been cracked for a long time, okay?? It's like playing.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobiavip
· 07-31 04:51
The verification mechanism is just an illusion!
View OriginalReply0
gaslight_gasfeezvip
· 07-31 04:49
Too lazy to look, the truth is that the principal always has a way.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManagervip
· 07-31 04:47
Projects with inadequate contract audits should not disturb my coin analysis.
View OriginalReply0
GhostChainLoyalistvip
· 07-31 04:47
Another project has been hacked? I've said it before, the technology is inadequate.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMinervip
· 07-31 04:38
Isn't it obvious that monopolizing the market is appealing?
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfervip
· 07-31 04:23
Where the arbitrage opportunities are is what players really care about, right?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)