How have trading volumes affected liquidity sources?

Liquidity in one pool can be significantly lower than in another, especially when compared with pools that include tokens lacking real potential. This is particularly evident on blockchains where overall trading and swapping volumes are relatively low.

On the $TON blockchain, during the start of the meme season, activity was at its peak. All key indicators such as TVL and volumes reached their highest levels, creating excellent conditions for swaps, liquidity provision, and overall market activity. However, once the hype faded and the focus shifted towards technology, even the most reliable liquidity sources began to see a decline in their TVL.
Some platforms were unable to withstand the drop in volumes and sank to the bottom — as was the case with Dedustio.

By contrast, when we look at STONfi, it is clear that after reaching a low point, liquidity has begun to recover. TVL has already shown a +20% increase, now standing at $61 million.
STONfi is the leading DEX, offering opportunities for liquidity provision, swaps, and staking. This allows users not only to earn but also to rely on a trusted source of liquidity.

Reliability comes from the fact that each liquidity source continues to introduce new technologies and innovations for liquidity providers and traders, ensuring swaps remain profitable for everyone. STONfi demonstrates this advantage clearly, positioning itself as the platform of choice for sustainable returns.
Liquidity should always be supplied to liquid pools — and at the same time deliver value to the provider.

The most reliable and high-quality technologies are available on STONfi.