Trust Wallet's Chrome browser extension was recently temporarily removed from the Google Chrome Web Store, which directly disrupted their plans. They originally wanted to quickly release an updated version to help users affected by recent security incidents, but got stuck at the publishing stage.
CEO Eowyn Chen explained that this delay is mainly due to review issues on the Chrome Web Store side. While it seems like a platform policy matter, it actually relates to the security of wallet users—without timely security patches, user risk remains high.
For the entire Web3 ecosystem, this is also a reminder: third-party platform reviews and policy adjustments can sometimes directly impact product iteration speed. As a leading wallet in the industry, Trust Wallet's movements naturally warrant attention.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PerennialLeek
· 01-05 02:01
Google gets stuck on security patches, it's really incredible. Wallet security is completely neglected.
Web3 is just like this, controlled by centralized platforms, it's really ironic.
Trust Wallet, no matter how big, still has to bow and scrape; those review folks call the shots.
Why is it always updated after the fact? Can't it be proactive?
Now affected users have to continue using problematic versions. Who's responsible?
The review speed of Chrome Web Store, how much longer do we have to wait?
It's clearly a security issue that can get stuck, this policy is just too outrageous.
If top wallets are like this, how can small wallets survive?
It feels like it's intentionally making things difficult, otherwise why so slow?
What about the compensation plan? Just leaving users hanging like this.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 01-04 23:48
Once again, centralized platforms are choking Web3.
---
The review efficiency in the Chrome Web Store is truly ridiculous; security patches can be delayed indefinitely.
---
Basically, Google wants to target whoever it wants, and wallet users have to wait to be hit.
---
Trust Wallet got compromised this time; how can other small wallets survive?
---
Web3 is ultimately still controlled by CeFi, how ironic.
---
If patches can't be released, users are under the sword of Damocles; this policy design is really disgusting.
---
So even decentralized wallets have to look at the big platforms' attitudes; how can that be called true decentralization?
---
Waiting to see, there will definitely be more stories behind this.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidated
· 01-04 18:52
Google's review speed is really slow, even security patches can get stuck
Once again, centralized platforms are causing trouble; Web3 still relies on itself
The removal of Chrome is too outrageous; user fund security cannot be delayed
TW is being targeted, and we small retail investors need to be even more cautious
The review process is so sluggish, how can it be worthy of user trust
Why do big platforms always drop the ball at critical moments?
Trust Wallet is stuck, indicating that no one can be completely independent of centralized systems
That's why self-custody is necessary; don't trust anyone
A one-day delay could mean a loss of millions
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 01-03 03:58
Another useless innovation. Chrome review got stuck on the security patch, and the theoretically feasible solution is now just a decoration.
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCut
· 01-02 02:31
Google is causing trouble again, is it because wallet providers are slow?
Google's review speed is truly outrageous, even security patches can get stuck...
Top wallets are all stuck, and smaller projects are even more hopeless.
If Chrome completely bans Web3 tools, it will be the end.
This is why decentralization is necessary, brother.
It's either being killed by reviews or hacked to death, no choice.
Security vulnerabilities still rely on third-party platforms to approve? Laughable.
This time, we really need to reflect on our dependence on CEXs and major platforms.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifier
· 01-02 02:28
nah this is exactly the problem tbh... chrome store review process is basically a black box, zero transparency on what triggered the delisting. insufficient validation from google's end imo
Reply0
NervousFingers
· 01-02 02:27
Google is causing trouble again, impressive
---
Security patches are stuck? Isn't this giving hackers an opportunity?
---
Head wallets are all blocked, what do we small investors use...
---
Policy review, it changes on a whim, Web3 is this annoying
---
The temporary delisting of Trust Wallet feels like an inevitable problem
---
Wait, users have to face risks before the security patch goes live, who can accept that?
---
What is Chrome Web Store doing, such low efficiency?
---
It's another platform monopoly causing trouble, the ecosystem is just being choked off
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighbor
· 01-02 02:25
Google is doing this again? Security patches are all stuck
---
Chrome's review process is a bit ridiculous, really need to reflect
---
Head wallets are all under control, what else can we trust
---
So, it's still necessary to diversify wallets to spread risk
---
This is the price of being bottlenecked by a single platform
---
Wait, was it temporarily taken down and then re-reviewed? This matter isn't over yet
---
Haha, the feeling of third-party platforms holding the power of life and death, the essence of centralization has been exposed
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-2fce706c
· 01-02 02:20
This is exactly what I mentioned earlier—the constraints of centralized platforms have always been a bottleneck in the trend. Trust Wallet being blocked is the best lesson; it's too late now if you haven't deployed a multi-chain backup plan.
---
Chrome can delete at will, and this move directly strikes at the very core of Web3. We've long needed to build our own ecosystem.
---
Security patches are being held back, and users are trembling in the wind—that's the cost of relying on third parties. I mentioned this last year.
---
Eowyn and others also have their struggles but can't speak out. When the Chrome Web Store tightens policies, even the biggest wallets have to bow their heads. Do they only realize this after suffering losses?
---
When the chain drops at a critical moment, how many people will still trust centralized app stores? This is an opportunity; those who understand are already making arrangements.
---
In simple terms, they haven't grasped the essence of decentralization and are still relying on others' platforms to make a living. Sooner or later, they'll be sanctioned.
---
Chrome's hurdle will be overcome sooner or later. Delays in patches are a naked threat to users. Do you feel the tension?
Trust Wallet's Chrome browser extension was recently temporarily removed from the Google Chrome Web Store, which directly disrupted their plans. They originally wanted to quickly release an updated version to help users affected by recent security incidents, but got stuck at the publishing stage.
CEO Eowyn Chen explained that this delay is mainly due to review issues on the Chrome Web Store side. While it seems like a platform policy matter, it actually relates to the security of wallet users—without timely security patches, user risk remains high.
For the entire Web3 ecosystem, this is also a reminder: third-party platform reviews and policy adjustments can sometimes directly impact product iteration speed. As a leading wallet in the industry, Trust Wallet's movements naturally warrant attention.