2026-01-10 17:31:06

Anichess's progress on the Aerodrome ecosystem: this wave of development has yielded good results. The Ignition phase of Aerodrome laid a solid foundation—over $4M in total locked value, more than 9,000 holders, over 1 million transactions, and over 400 million veAERO voting support, driving the emission incentive of 1.5 million AERO. Notably, their operational strategy is very clever—continuously deepening liquidity without disrupting the native logic of on-chain chess games. The upcoming plans are worth watching, as there is still room to further expand the ecosystem depth.

AERO-2,59%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PaperHandsCriminal

· 01-13 16:35

Damn, Anichess really nailed it this time. Locking 4 million tokens and tricking over 9,000 people in. I was actually planning to go all in at first, but now I’m kicking myself for not doing it.

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 01-13 14:36

Anichess's operational rhythm is indeed good. Although the 4M+ TVL isn't considered large, the gameplay creativity of that chess game is truly attractive.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWizard

· 01-12 23:16

Wow, over 4M in TVL, Anichess is really playing well on Aerodrome. They've found a good breakthrough for liquidity in board games, but the 1.5 million emission incentives need to actually be implemented. Over 9,000 holders, it seems promising, but I don't know if it can last until the next round. I need to think about this strategy; it feels like there's still room for operation. A trading volume of 1 million sounds impressive, but how much of it is genuine interaction? Aerodrome's ecosystem expansion finally shows some substantial content.

View OriginalReply0

LayoffMiner

· 01-10 18:00

Wow, Anichess is really impressive this time. Starting with a 4M locked amount is quite stable. A trading volume of 1 million indicates good popularity, but there's still room to further explore liquidity. It's not easy for a board game blockchain game to persist until now; it depends on whether it can truly retain users in the future. Will the ecosystem experience another wave of popularity if the 1.5 million AERO incentives are invested? It's worth continuing to observe. The strategy is indeed clever, not messing up the native logic, which is much better than many projects.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichMaker

· 01-10 17:47

Oh wow, this data actually looks pretty substantial, 4M locked tokens is not a small amount. --- Board games can still be played in so many ways, it’s really interesting. --- Over 9,000 holders just to support the ecosystem? Still a long way to go. --- The support for veAERO voting is so strong, it seems someone is definitely backing it. --- The liquidity aspect is well handled; not messing up the native logic is already a win. --- The 1.5 million AERO emission incentives—will there be significant inflation pressure later on? --- Feels like still in the early stages, just waiting to see how it develops. --- No one has really done well in the on-chain board game sector, but Anichess has some ideas. --- Transaction volume has exceeded one million trades, so activity is there, but what about retention? --- The ecosystem expansion space is so large, just worried the team might not execute properly.

View OriginalReply0

WalletAnxietyPatient

· 01-10 17:39

Wow, this data really hit a ceiling, over 9,000 holders just took off.

View OriginalReply0

LeekCutter

· 01-10 17:34

Honestly, the 4M TVL still needs to keep improving. --- The combination of board games + AMM is really quite unique. --- 9000 holders sounds like a lot, but how many can actually be retained is the real point. --- veAERO voting definitely has some substance, indicating that consensus is still there. --- 1.5 million AERO emissions—how long can this level of effort last? --- Deepening liquidity without breaking the original logic—this operation deserves a thumbs up. --- Next, it depends on whether more on-chain users can be attracted. --- 100,000 transactions sound impressive; what about the average size per transaction? --- There’s still room for ecosystem expansion, but there are quite a few competitors as well. --- I appreciate this steady growth curve; not following the trend and messing around blindly.

View OriginalReply0