Take Plush Pepe as an example: there are currently 2,825 pieces trading at a $13k floor price. Here's an interesting thought experiment—what happens if the circulating supply contracts by 2-4x?
Let's think through the mechanics. Fewer collectibles in the market typically tightens competition among buyers, which could reshape pricing dynamics. But the real question isn't just about price escalation—it's about what else changes.
Would new Plush Pepe variants emerge? How would rarity tiers shift if supply suddenly became scarcer? These aren't trivial details. In collectibles markets, scarcity directly influences desirability, and desirability influences what traders are willing to pay.
The secondary angle: if supply compression happens, does the aesthetic or utility of the remaining pieces matter more? Would collectors prioritize different attributes? It's a cascading effect—reduce supply, reset expectations, redefine value.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDetective
· 8h ago
The logic of burning coins to reduce supply, I always feel there's something off about it... The real situation is often that holders become even more passive.
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrince
· 8h ago
Supply decreases by 2-4 times, and the 13k floor price directly soars? The logic is clear, but it feels too idealistic, haha.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 8h ago
Among the 2825 tokens in circulation, there are definitely whales hoarding. This number is too neat... Reduce by 2-4 times? I want to see if those early addresses will suddenly wake up.
View OriginalReply0
potentially_notable
· 8h ago
The burn coin debate is back again. It sounds great in theory, but who actually dares to do it for real?
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapy
· 8h ago
Listen, about the supply contraction... can it really drive the market up? It still seems to depend on whether someone is willing to buy in.
---
Again with the "scarcity determines price" logic. While it's not wrong, can Plush Pepe really hold up...
---
Ha, from 2825 to 1400, it's a game of chance. Whoever holds steady wins.
---
Basically, it's a psychological game. Less supply ≠ necessarily higher prices. There needs to be a consensus.
---
Wait, if a new variant appears, wouldn't that dilute liquidity again? This logic is a bit tangled.
---
It's quite interesting, but if we really burn that much supply, can it be executed?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 8h ago
Reduce by 4 times? How many people would need to gather to dump the market... Can the floor stay stable if we keep playing like this?
Take Plush Pepe as an example: there are currently 2,825 pieces trading at a $13k floor price. Here's an interesting thought experiment—what happens if the circulating supply contracts by 2-4x?
Let's think through the mechanics. Fewer collectibles in the market typically tightens competition among buyers, which could reshape pricing dynamics. But the real question isn't just about price escalation—it's about what else changes.
Would new Plush Pepe variants emerge? How would rarity tiers shift if supply suddenly became scarcer? These aren't trivial details. In collectibles markets, scarcity directly influences desirability, and desirability influences what traders are willing to pay.
The secondary angle: if supply compression happens, does the aesthetic or utility of the remaining pieces matter more? Would collectors prioritize different attributes? It's a cascading effect—reduce supply, reset expectations, redefine value.