2026-01-17 17:28:35

After reviewing $SENT's token distribution plan, this design is indeed quite good. The community, users, and contributors received over 65% of the share, which is more generous than most new projects on the market. From a tokenomics perspective, this kind of bias can incentivize those who genuinely participate in ecosystem development and also reduce the risks for early investors. Proper allocation of weights can attract more builders to join, which is quite beneficial for the long-term development of the project ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainTalker

· 3h ago

Actually, let's break this down through the lens of game theory... 65% to community ain't just generous, it's empirically proven incentive design. most projects get this fundamentally backwards tbh.

Reply0

MEVHunterZhang

· 3h ago

65% to the community? That's the true spirit of Web3.

View OriginalReply0

TxFailed

· 3h ago

ngl, 65% to community sounds great *in theory*... but we've all seen this movie before. technically speaking, distribution plans look amazing on paper until they actually hit mainnet and suddenly everyone's dumping simultaneously. psa: check the vesting schedules fr, edge case alert if there's no proper lock-ups.

Reply0

fomo_fighter

· 3h ago

65% to the community? That's more considerate than most projects I've seen, not a gimmick.

View OriginalReply0

Anon32942

· 3h ago

65% to the community? Seriously, now that's what I call playing for real

View OriginalReply0