Analysis of the Three Major Models of Decentralization Platforms and Future Development

Analysis of the Development Path of Decentralization Platforms

Decentralization platform games have attracted attention as an emerging field, and their development path is worth exploring. This article will start from the development history of traditional platform games and analyze three possible models of decentralized platform games and their advantages and disadvantages.

Development of Traditional Gaming Platforms

The traditional gaming industry platforms are mainly divided into three types:

  1. Studio Mode: Start from a game studio and gradually develop into a large company with multiple game IPs. Representative companies include Blizzard, Nintendo, etc.

  2. Development Engine Model: Provides game development tools and engines, allowing users to create their own games. A typical representative is Roblox.

  3. Distribution platform model: provides publishing and distribution channels for games. Steam is a representative of this model.

Self-developed premium or distributed games? Analyzing the development path of decentralized platforms

Development Path of Blockchain Gaming Platforms

1. Game Studio Model and Public Chain Ecosystem

Some successful blockchain gaming projects choose to issue their own public chains, such as Dapper Labs' Flow and Sky Mavis' Ronin. This model relies on the influence of a single game, requiring the first product to ignite the market.

Advantages: It can provide customized infrastructure for games.

Disadvantages: The uncertainty of a single game may affect the development of the public chain, and the security risks are relatively high.

Self-developed quality products or distributed games? Analyzing the development path of decentralized platforms

2. Development Engine Model

Decentralization game development engines like Fragnova and Cocos-CBX provide developers with more freedom and creativity.

Advantages:

  • Better protect game data and user assets
  • Provide developers with more autonomy
  • Achieve a fairer and more transparent gaming ecosystem

Disadvantages:

  • Technically still needs improvement
  • Less competitive compared to mature centralized engines
  • The ecosystem and community are relatively small

Self-developed quality products or distributed games? Analyzing the development path of decentralized platforms

3. Distribution platform model

The characteristics of light assets and heavy operations make it a choice for many decentralized platforms. TreasureDAO and Gala Games are representatives of this model.

Advantages:

  • Frequent low-cost trial and error is beneficial for discovering "hit products".
  • Can quickly accumulate the number of games
  • Can derive additional functions such as NFT trading

Disadvantages:

  • The quality of games varies.
  • Compared to traditional platforms, there is still a gap in the number and quality of games.

Self-developed premium or distributed games? An analysis of the development path of decentralized platforms

Development Space and Challenges

Decentralization platform still has huge development space, but faces the following challenges:

  1. How to better protect user rights using blockchain technology
  2. How to attract more players and developers to join
  3. How to compete with traditional platforms in the popular game sector

Self-developed boutique or distributed games? Analyzing the development path of Decentralization platforms

Conclusion

The future development potential of decentralized gaming platforms is enormous, but continuous innovation and improvement in technology, content, and user experience are needed to stand out in the fierce market competition. With technological advancements and ecosystem improvements, decentralized gaming platforms are expected to disrupt the traditional gaming industry landscape in the future.

Self-developed premium or distributed games? Analyzing the development path of decentralized platforms

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainWorkervip
· 07-30 17:22
Who understands? It's better to play traditional games.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMastervip
· 07-29 20:52
What makes money, understand what; the Steam model really has potential compared to Gate.
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poetvip
· 07-29 17:09
Tired of Cryptocurrency Trading, it's time to play some games.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractRebelvip
· 07-29 17:06
Traditional game companies will eventually go bankrupt.
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidationvip
· 07-29 17:05
play people for suckers, just hard play people for suckers
View OriginalReply0
ApeEscapeArtistvip
· 07-29 17:01
Isn't this just still Be Played for Suckers?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)