
Expiration refers to an action or permission becoming invalid once preset conditions are met, such as a time limit, a status change, or a shift in network environment. In Web3, expiration is crucial because it confines permissions and risks within defined “time and condition” boundaries, reducing abuse and replay attacks.
You can think of expiration like a coupon’s expiry date: once the validity period passes, orders can no longer be filled, expired signatures cannot be used to call smart contracts, and expired approvals are rejected by the contract. This mechanism minimizes misuse and protects your funds.
Order expiration is typically governed by “time and execution conditions.” The three most common order strategies are: GTC, IOC, and FOK.
On Gate’s spot and derivatives trading interfaces, execution strategies such as IOC and FOK are commonly available. Selecting IOC ensures any unfilled portion of your order expires instantly; choosing FOK avoids partial executions, enhancing strategy certainty.
Expiration for signatures and authorizations is typically managed using a “deadline” or “validity window.” Many DApps include a “deadline” field in signature requests; after this time, the signature becomes unusable.
EIP-2612 is a “permit signature” standard that allows token spending approvals without an on-chain transaction. It includes a deadline—after which the permit signature expires and the contract will reject any attempts to use it.
EIP-712 is a structured signature standard that embeds critical fields such as chain ID, contract domain, and expiration time within the signature. This prevents replay attacks across different environments; even if a signature is copied, it cannot be used once expired or if the context does not match.
When your wallet prompts for a signature, check if there is a validity or deadline field. The longer the validity, the larger the window for potential misuse; shorter windows are more secure but require timely action on your part.
Smart contracts usually enforce expiration by validating deadlines at function entry points. A common approach is to check if the current block timestamp is less than or equal to the deadline; if not, the function call fails, marking it as expired.
Block timestamps are set by validators and allow for slight deviations. Contracts often include buffer periods to avoid premature expiration while ensuring actions cannot be performed after expiration. Developers may add fields like “validUntil” in authorization or order data structures for unified validation.
In Bitcoin’s UTXO model, time-based scripts also affect a transaction’s validity window. For example, a script may specify that coins cannot be spent before or after a certain time—effectively using time constraints to manage transaction validity.
On-chain time determines “when” something expires, while nonce determines “whether” something can be replayed.
A nonce acts as a transaction counter: each account’s transaction nonce must increment. If a new transaction with the same nonce is accepted by the network, the previous one is replaced and cleared from mempools—functionally expiring the old transaction.
Block timestamps are provided by block producers and are not absolute real-world times but are critical for determining expiry. Contracts rely on block time for expiration checks to avoid dependence on external clocks.
On Ethereum and compatible chains, expiration is primarily defined at the contract and DApp level, commonly using “deadline” fields and “nonce replacement” for security. Default token approvals do not expire, so many applications use EIP-2612 to introduce expiry dates.
On Bitcoin, time-related scripts and lock mechanisms define transaction validity windows at a more fundamental level, determining whether coins can be spent before or after certain times.
On Solana, transactions can specify a “last valid block height”; after this block, the transaction becomes invalid—providing a validity window based on time or block height. In some Layer 2 networks, logic mirrors Ethereum’s with expiration mostly handled at the contract and application layer.
Expiration creates two main types of risk: premature expiration (causing operation failure) and delayed expiration (increasing misuse windows).
Exercise caution with fund security operations. Expiry does not automatically eliminate risk; long-term approvals that have not expired require proactive management.
In Gate’s trading interface, your choice of execution strategy directly determines how orders expire:
For authorization expiry, if you interact with DApps through Gate’s Web3 portal or wallet, check if authorizations include deadlines. For unlimited approvals without expiry dates, regularly audit and revoke permissions for unused DApps via the authorization management page.
Data source staleness is another form of “expiration.” Oracles typically provide timestamps; contracts check whether incoming data falls within an acceptable freshness window. If not, prices are considered “stale,” and calls are rejected—equivalent to data-level expiration.
As of late 2025, leading DeFi protocols increasingly validate data freshness in pricing and interest feeds—requiring frequent updates to mitigate risks during volatile markets. For NFTs and metadata stored on centralized servers, broken links mean content is treated as expired by applications—the result is functionally identical to expiration.
At the node level, blockchain clients are moving toward not storing historical data indefinitely. Very old on-chain data may not be available from standard nodes; developers must use archive services or custom indexing to avoid business interruptions from “expired” data access.
Expiration narrows the effective window for orders, signatures, authorizations, and data—serving as an essential security and governance tool in Web3. By understanding boundaries set by time and state, leveraging contract-level expiry checks and nonce replacement alongside exchange order strategies and DApp authorization management, you can balance execution efficiency with controlled misuse and replay risk. Always revoke long-term approvals when no longer needed, select order validity according to strategy, explicitly check data freshness within contracts, and continuously audit your activity—turning “expiration” from a hidden threat into proactive protection.
An expiration mode describes the specific way a function, order, or authorization ceases to work. In Web3, expiration modes include time-based expiry (e.g., order timeout), parameter-driven expiry (e.g., price changes beyond expected ranges), and revocation-based expiry (e.g., manual approval cancellation). Understanding different modes helps you avoid unexpected trade failures or fund risks.
“Stalling” refers to trades slowing down or becoming stuck; “expiration” means a function has completely stopped working or become invalid. Expiration has a clear end point (such as an order reaching its expiry time), while stalling is about degraded performance. An order may eventually expire due to stalling—but they are distinct concepts.
Automatic order expiration is a built-in safeguard typically triggered by three factors: time (validity period ends), market conditions (price moves beyond user-set thresholds), or block constraints (passing a specified block height). This design protects your trades from being filled during extreme market swings.
Authorization expiry and order expiry are separate concepts. Authorization expiry means your permission for a contract to use your funds has lapsed; order expiry means your trade instruction itself has become invalid. A single transaction can face both: authorization expiry will prevent execution even if an order is valid; order expiry will prevent fulfillment even if authorization remains.
To determine if an order has expired:
If your order has expired, you will need to create a new one to continue trading.


