
A Layer 2 protocol is a scaling solution built atop a Layer 1 blockchain, separating transaction processing from mainnet settlement. This design enhances efficiency while retaining as much of the mainnet’s security as possible. You can think of the mainnet as the central ledger of a bank, while Layer 2 protocols function like branch offices that process transactions before recording summarized results back to the main ledger.
From a user perspective, a Layer 2 protocol operates as an independent network or execution environment. Here, you initiate transactions and pay lower fees, while the final outcome is submitted to a smart contract on the mainnet, forming a verifiable record.
Layer 2 protocols exist to address mainnet congestion and high transaction fees. Public blockchains have limited resources; when demand grows due to more users and applications, fees rise and confirmation times slow, making high-frequency use cases impractical.
During peak activity, the mainnet resembles a crowded highway toll booth—more traffic means more congestion. Layer 2 protocols alleviate this by diverting most “traffic” onto nearby on-ramps and auxiliary roads, reducing mainnet load and enabling sustainable operation for more applications.
The core of Layer 2 protocols is “batching and proof.” Transactions are executed on the Layer 2, where a sequencer queues and batches them before writing the batch and corresponding proof back to the mainnet. This allows the mainnet to verify batches and proofs instead of processing each transaction individually.
The most common implementation is called Rollup. Optimistic Rollups use “fraud proofs,” assuming results are correct by default—if challenged within a set period, evidence can be submitted to overturn fraudulent results. ZK Rollups use “validity proofs,” providing cryptographic evidence that Layer 2 execution was correct, which the mainnet then verifies.
There are two key operational components:
Layer 2 protocols fall into two primary categories: Optimistic Rollups and ZK Rollups. Optimistic Rollups, such as Optimism and Arbitrum, rely on challenge periods and fraud proofs. ZK Rollups, like zkSync and StarkNet, use zero-knowledge proofs for instant validity confirmation.
Variants also exist: Validium stores data off-chain in an availability layer to further reduce costs, at the expense of some data availability guarantees. Historically, Plasma emphasized submitting minimal subchain data to the mainnet but has largely been superseded by Rollups. Importantly, sidechains are typically not considered Layer 2 protocols, since they do not directly inherit mainnet security but instead depend on their own validator sets.
Using Layer 2 protocols involves four steps: Prepare – Deposit – Use – Withdraw. Following these steps helps reduce asset and operational risks for beginners.
Step 1: Set up your wallet and network. Install a popular wallet and add the target Layer 2 protocol network. Wallets manage addresses and signatures; adding the network enables you to transact on that network.
Step 2: Deposit assets into Layer 2. On Gate, you can choose to deposit or withdraw using the relevant Layer 2 network (e.g., Arbitrum One, Optimism), sending assets directly to or from that network; or you can use an official bridge to migrate from the mainnet. Always ensure “network and address match,” and test with a small amount first.
Step 3: Interact with applications on Layer 2. Open your desired app—such as a decentralized exchange or NFT marketplace—authorize access, then initiate transactions. Fees on Layer 2 are usually paid in ETH or the network’s designated token and are significantly lower than on the mainnet.
Step 4: Withdraw assets or deposit back to Gate. Withdrawal processes and wait times differ across Layer 2s; optimistic rollups often have challenge periods. Alternatively, you can deposit directly to Gate using the matching network to avoid loss.
Layer 2 protocols are best suited for high-frequency, fee-sensitive scenarios such as:
On Gate, typical workflows involve withdrawing assets to Arbitrum or Optimism to participate in Layer 2 applications, then depositing back via the corresponding network for settlement or conversion.
Layer 2 protocols are not risk-free. Main risks include: bridge risk (cross-chain or cross-network bridge smart contracts may have vulnerabilities), sequencer single-point-of-failure or downtime risk, risks from external data availability components, and potential smart contract flaws.
In terms of cost, while transaction fees are lower on Layer 2, you’ll still incur: gas fees on Layer 2, bridge fees, and time costs for withdrawals—especially for optimistic rollups with challenge periods. For fund safety, it’s best to test with small amounts, verify networks and addresses, use only official or audited bridges, and monitor project risk disclosures.
The key distinction is security inheritance. Layer 2 protocols submit batches and proofs to the mainnet—their security is derived from the mainnet itself. Sidechains are independent blockchains that use their own validators for security; the mainnet acts only as an entry/exit point for assets.
Both approaches reduce costs and improve speed in practice, but sidechains have a risk profile more akin to standalone blockchains—issues cannot be directly arbitrated by the mainnet. In contrast, Layer 2 protocols maintain security and traceability through proof mechanisms and mainnet contracts.
Recent trends in Layer 2 protocols include: after Ethereum’s EIP-4844 upgrade, data costs dropped significantly—prompting more applications to migrate to Layer 2; sequencers are moving toward decentralization and multi-node fault tolerance; data availability layers and proof services are becoming modularized, with shared proofs and external DA solutions emerging; interoperability between different Layer 2s is improving for a smoother user experience.
Since upgrades post-2024 have further reduced costs and improved confirmation speed, developers are experimenting with more complex use cases like on-chain social networks, gaming, and real-time settlements. Users now benefit from clearer wallet guidance, bridging options, payment gateways, and improved risk controls.
At their core, Layer 2 protocols separate “execution” from “settlement.” By batching transactions and submitting proofs to the mainnet, they process large volumes efficiently without sacrificing security. When starting out, choose established networks, confirm network/address matches, test with small amounts, prioritize official bridges or Gate’s supported networks for deposits/withdrawals, and pay attention to challenge periods and fee structures. As infrastructure improves and standards evolve, Layer 2 protocols are poised to become the default platform for everyday on-chain activities.
Popular Layer 2 solutions include Optimism, Arbitrum, Polygon, among others. Optimism and Arbitrum utilize Rollup technology—boosting efficiency by batching transactions onto Ethereum’s mainnet—while Polygon uses a sidechain model with independent transaction validation. Each approach balances security, speed, and cost differently; newcomers should choose based on ecosystem fit.
Yes—you must first bridge your assets from Ethereum mainnet to your chosen Layer 2 protocol. This can be done via official bridge tools (such as Optimism Bridge or Arbitrum Bridge), typically incurring a cross-chain fee. Once assets arrive on Layer 2, transaction fees drop sharply—enabling frequent operations without high gas costs.
Layer 2 protocols inherit Ethereum mainnet security by settling transactions back to the mainnet. However, security models vary; Rollup solutions generally carry lower risks, while newer protocols may have vulnerabilities due to code complexity. Beginners should stick with highly used, well-audited protocols and avoid committing large sums at once.
Withdrawal times depend on the specific protocol. Optimism typically requires seven days due to its fraud-proof period; Arbitrum takes about one week; Polygon withdrawals are faster at around one to two hours. For faster withdrawals, third-party liquidity providers can accelerate the process—but extra fees apply.
Gate supports deposits and withdrawals for major Layer 2 networks like Arbitrum and Optimism. Users can directly select their preferred Layer 2 network within Gate for seamless asset transfers—no manual bridging required. This allows you to enjoy low transaction fees while avoiding complex cross-chain processes.


