
A lock-up period refers to a predetermined timeframe during which assets are temporarily restricted from being transferred, sold, or withdrawn.
This concept is commonly applied to tokens or funds held by project teams and early investors, as well as to certain exchange products such as fixed-term savings and staking programs. The lock-up period sets rules that prevent the movement of these assets for a specified duration.
The opposite of a lock-up period is "unlocking," when assets become available again after the specified conditions or time are met. Vesting specifically describes a schedule where ownership rights to assets are gradually established, often via linear or cliff-based releases. Understanding the relationship between these terms helps you determine when your assets become accessible.
Lock-up periods directly affect token supply, price volatility, and the liquidity of your funds.
When a large volume of tokens unlock at the same time, there’s a sudden increase in available supply, potentially putting downward pressure on prices. Conversely, extended lock-ups reduce short-term selling pressure and encourage long-term alignment among holders. For users participating in savings or staking products, the length of the lock-up determines how soon you can access your funds and whether you can achieve higher annual yields.
Investment decisions are also influenced by lock-up terms. When a new token launches with a long lock-up for teams and institutions, short-term sell pressure is minimized. If a major unlock is approaching, especially in large quantities, it's wise to assess the associated risks. For active traders, monitoring unlock calendars can help you avoid unnecessary exposure during periods of heightened volatility.
Lock-up periods are enforced through smart contracts or platform rules, which specify both the timeframe and release method.
There are two common release methods. Linear release distributes tokens gradually at fixed intervals—such as releasing 5% of the total each month, similar to a paycheck installment. Cliff release involves no distribution until a specified "cliff" date, at which point a large portion is released at once (for example, 20% after 12 months), followed by regular monthly releases.
For exchange products, the lock-up period typically corresponds to a fixed term. Fixed savings or staking might offer options like 30, 60, or 90 days. Upon maturity, both principal and interest are paid out; if early redemption is allowed, there’s usually a penalty or reduced earnings—these terms are detailed in the product documentation.
From a technical perspective, project teams often lock team and investor tokens using smart contracts that transparently publish parameters like start date, total amount, and release frequency. This transparency allows anyone to track unlocking schedules on-chain, helping the market anticipate future token supply changes.
Lock-up periods are prevalent in token vesting schedules, DeFi staking, and exchange-based wealth management products.
For project tokens, team and investor allocations often follow a structure such as a one-year cliff followed by 36 months of linear release. This discourages short-term dumping and incentivizes long-term development. Public unlock calendars allow secondary market participants to anticipate supply shifts.
In DeFi staking and liquidity mining, protocols reward users who lock tokens for specified periods. The longer the lock-up, the higher the reward multiplier—for example, locking for three months earns standard rewards, while twelve months could grant 1.5x rewards. Some protocols also grant governance voting rights to long-term stakers.
On exchanges such as Gate, users can select fixed-term earning products with lock-up options of 30, 60, or 90 days. During the lock-up, principal cannot be sold or withdrawn; upon maturity, both principal and earnings are paid out in full. Some products allow early redemption with reduced returns or waiting periods. Platforms provide clear rules and maturity dates in their announcements to help users plan liquidity.
Mitigate risk by diversifying lock-up terms, monitoring unlock calendars, and employing hedging strategies if necessary.
First, consult the unlock calendar provided by projects or platforms—these typically list release times and amounts on their websites, contract documentation, or official announcements. Mark significant unlock dates on your personal calendar to avoid increasing positions during volatility windows.
Second, diversify across different lock-up terms and products. Avoid allocating all your funds to a single lock duration or token. Instead, split your assets among varying terms such as 30, 60, and 90 days to create a “ladder,” ensuring some liquidity becomes available at regular intervals if needed.
Third, reserve liquid backup funds and evaluate early redemption costs. Keep some assets in flexible or on-demand products for emergencies to minimize forced early withdrawals; if early redemption is necessary, calculate penalties or lost earnings before proceeding.
If you’re experienced with risk management tools, consider basic hedging during high-risk unlock periods—such as taking an opposing position with futures contracts. However, these tactics involve additional risk and should be used cautiously.
Over the past year, unlock schedules have become more concentrated, platforms are favoring medium- to short-term products, and overall transparency has improved.
By Q4 2025, public unlock calendars show that most top-100 market cap projects remain in their vesting phase. Linear releases dominate; cliffs are mainly used at the start of vesting periods. Several leading projects will hit major unlock peaks in the second half of 2025—market volatility and trading volumes typically spike during these weeks.
On exchanges throughout 2025, fixed-term savings products have increasingly centered around 30–90 day durations; longer-term products (≥180 days) have declined in popularity as users seek greater liquidity. At Gate, popular earning products in Q3 2025 generally offer 30–60 day terms with annual yields ranging from mid-single digits to low double digits. Longer lock-ups offer higher yields but may result in lower effective returns if redeemed early.
Disclosure of unlock data has become more standardized—projects and platforms now routinely publish detailed timelines and quantities in their announcements. In recent months, more projects have integrated on-chain dashboards into their official sites to enhance accessibility for secondary market participants. This push for supply-side transparency reflects growing market demand for clear unlock information and has established dual reporting through smart contracts and official statements as an industry norm.
A lock-up period is when assets are restricted from movement or sale; the unlock period is when those restrictions begin to lift gradually. In simple terms: during the lock-up period, assets are frozen; during the unlock period, they are progressively released. The unlock period follows the end of the lock-up period—only then can investors start selling their assets in tranches.
No. During the lock-up period, tokens are fully frozen by smart contracts or escrow mechanisms and cannot be traded or transferred on any exchange. This is fundamental to enforcing restricted liquidity. Only after the lock-up ends and unlocking begins can you start selling or transferring tokens—subject to the project’s specific unlocking schedule.
A lock-up period serves as a commitment mechanism by project teams to signal long-term plans rather than seeking quick profits. It restricts large-scale selling by early investors and team members, thereby supporting price stability and giving ordinary investors greater confidence—knowing that major stakeholders can’t dump tokens immediately upon launch helps foster healthy market expectations.
Gate displays relevant lock-up data at project launch—including duration, unlock schedule, and tranche percentages. This information is available on each project's detail page or token info section on Gate. Review this data before investing to better assess potential sell pressure from upcoming unlocks and avoid buying during high-volatility periods.
Not necessarily. While longer lock-ups can reduce short-term sell pressure, excessively long periods may indicate weak risk management or lack of confidence from project teams. More important is how unlocking is scheduled—a gradual release carries less risk than a single large unlock event. It’s best to consider all factors together: lock-up length, vesting schedule, and project fundamentals—not just the length of the restriction itself.


