2025-12-09 14:24:00

The stablecoin battlefield has gotten pretty interesting lately.

There’s been a lot of activity in Europe—BNP Paribas, along with nine other banks, is planning to launch a euro stablecoin in the second half of 2026. The project is being managed by Qivalis, which is licensed by the Dutch central bank, and it has to comply with the MiCA regulations. Clearly, the compliance bar is set quite high. The European strategy is obvious: they don’t want to just watch others lead the digital currency race—they want a say in it and hope to provide new options for local businesses and users along the way.

But there are challenges. Even the Dutch central bank governor has warned that if the stablecoin market grows unchecked, it could disrupt monetary policy. And the awkward reality is that euro stablecoins currently account for less than 1% of the global market share—the foundation is too weak, and there are several hurdles to overcome before making a comeback.

What about the US? Trump signed the GENIUS Act, which specifically sets rules for payment stablecoins. You can see that everyone’s after this sector, but each has a different approach. Europe is taking an alliance and compliance route, while the US is moving quickly with a legislative framework.

There’s also an incident that really illustrates the point—Tether halted EURt euro stablecoin redemptions because of the new MiCA regulations. What does this show? When the rules change, issuers have to adapt, or risk crashing out at any moment.

Honestly, stablecoins right now are like a half-finished product. Both Europe and the US are scrambling to secure their positions, but no one is confident that they’ll come out on top. Regulators are worried about potential problems, issuers are afraid of stepping on landmines, and the market is still in a trial-and-error phase.

The game has only just begun, and how it develops will depend on how all sides balance the scales—getting the market moving while keeping risks from exploding.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AllInAlice

· 2025-12-12 08:51

Europe is pushing for compliance, and the US is taking the lead. Honestly, it's all about betting on who can survive until the end. --- The move by Tether to halt redemptions is really ruthless. --- Wait, the euro stablecoin doesn't even hold 1% market share? How can it win? --- As compliance frameworks become increasingly strict, issuers are really caught in the middle and struggling. --- Still launching a semi-finished product? Isn't that just the fate of latecomers? --- Once this US legislation passes, can Europe's alliance strategy still be viable? --- The stablecoin battle feels like walking a tightrope on barbed wire—one wrong move and it's a crash. --- I believe the Dutch Central Bank's warning; reckless growth can indeed lead to explosions. --- The change from Tether to EURt redemptions shows that regulations can really control issuers. --- It only came out in 2026, the hype is probably already cooled down, haha.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalDetective

· 2025-12-09 14:53

This whole stablecoin drama in Europe and the US basically comes down to everyone wanting to be king of the hill, but no one actually has the guts. As soon as the regulations change, Tether immediately halts redemptions—it's a tough time to be an issuer. Compliance, compliance—after all that, you can't even keep 1% of the market share. Isn't that just tying your own hands? The US is rolling out legislative frameworks and racing ahead, while Europe is still holding alliance meetings—there's a huge gap in efficiency. Instead of waiting for 2026, it's better to keep an eye on who's quietly staking their claim right now. Those are the real winners.

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinArbitrageur

· 2025-12-09 14:52

Wait, euro stablecoins don't even have a 1% market share? How are we supposed to play this game? --- Tether's latest move basically got sanctioned by MiCA, compliance costs are just exploding. --- To put it bluntly, every country is afraid of USDT monopolizing, but none of them can come up with anything decent themselves. --- Launching a euro stablecoin in half a year by 2026? By then, it'll be way too late. --- The US GENIUS Act is moving so fast, Europe is about to get left behind again. --- Stablecoins feel like a giant performance art project—everyone's already blocking each other before the rules are even set. --- Tether suspending redemptions just shows that no token issuer can really stand strong in front of regulations. --- The US and Europe are fighting hard—how are things going on our side? --- Before risk explodes everywhere, whoever can run fastest wins.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainHolmes

· 2025-12-09 14:49

Europe dragged its feet for over two years just to come up with a stablecoin, while the US went straight to passing a bill... The gap is really huge. The moment Tether got blocked, it was clear: whoever makes the rules gets to eat, everyone else just watches. With only 1% market share, they still have the nerve to talk about a comeback? Give me a break. Regulators and issuers are all gambling, betting on who will back down first, while the market is just along for the ride. No one really wants to win this game; everyone’s just waiting for someone else to blow up first. Compliance, in the end, is just a way to cover their own backs. Ridiculous. Trump’s side is quick to seize opportunities as always, while Europe is characteristically a step behind. MiCA has annoyed everyone, but that just goes to show... whoever dares to touch this piece of meat will get bitten.

View OriginalReply0

SilentAlpha

· 2025-12-09 14:46

Everyone wants to win the stablecoin game, but no one dares to bet everything. --- When Tether halted redemptions, it was actually telling everyone—the rules have changed, you have to adapt, or you’ll get taken out. --- Europe focuses on compliance, the US is racing for speed, but in the end, it all comes down to who can last the longest. --- A 1% market share is definitely awkward, but on the flip side, as long as you’re not completely blocked, there’s still a chance. --- The central bank governor’s warning basically boils down to one thing: don’t let stablecoins spiral out of control. --- It feels like the core of this round of the stablecoin war is the battle for rule-making power—whoever sets the framework first gains the upper hand. --- With MiCA in play, life is definitely tougher for issuers—they have to pay close attention to the regulators at all times. --- Let’s wait and see—2026 is still a long way off, and there are too many variables in between.

View OriginalReply0