2025-12-18 23:20:49

Bitcoin this week has been quite lively, with data and opinions colliding.

Let's start with the most eye-catching data—on-chain active addresses dropped to 660,000, hitting a nearly one-year low. This number has sparked quite a bit of discussion. Some are worried that declining network activity could directly impact miners' revenue expectations, while others point out that the value of block space might also be under pressure. Is this a temporary adjustment or a warning sign that needs attention? The market remains divided.

Meanwhile, the threat of quantum computing has resurfaced. Some analysis firms have issued warnings, suggesting that quantum technology could pose a substantial challenge to early cryptographic frameworks. However, this view isn't popular among core developers—they generally believe that such threats are overhyped and that the real danger is still far off.

The topics are increasing, but one voice keeps repeating—long-term scarcity is the key. Voices like Robert Kiyosaki continue to emphasize not to be fooled by short-term fluctuations; the fundamental attribute remains unchanged.

Interestingly, December 12 quietly passed—exactly 15 years since Satoshi Nakamoto's last post.

How do you interpret the current situation? Is it a normal market adjustment or a sign of an upcoming trend? Interested partners are welcome to share their thoughts.

BTC-5,55%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationKing

· 2025-12-20 17:54

660,000 active addresses really don't scare me; Bitcoin isn't dead The scare tactics about quantum computing have been seen through by developers long ago Scarcity is a stone that whoever holds it profits from it Satoshi Nakamoto hasn't spoken in 15 years, but his code has been speaking all along; whether you listen or not is your business

View OriginalReply0

SolidityJester

· 2025-12-18 23:32

With 660,000 active addresses, people are really panicking, but I think this is just a shakeout, don't overreact. I've heard too many claims about quantum computing; developers say there's nothing major, it still feels like overhyped marketing. Satoshi Nakamoto hasn't appeared in 15 years, and that's the most mysterious part, more shocking than any data. I believe in the theory of Cleese; the long-term scarcity is indeed top-notch, but I can't help but watch short-term fluctuations, the greed problem strikes again. Is the decline in activity a sign of opportunity or a dangerous signal? It probably depends on how the next one or two weeks unfold.

View OriginalReply0

ApeEscapeArtist

· 2025-12-18 23:23

660,000 addresses hit a new low? I think this is more of a shakeout, don't be too nervous. Quantum computing threats? Just listen to what developers say, analysis agencies are alarmist all day long. Scarcity is eternal, Changqing is right. Satoshi Nakamoto hasn't spoken in 15 years... thinking about it, it's a bit nostalgic. This is just a normal correction, nothing to panic about. Short-term data fluctuations are not that interesting; the key is how holders think. I'm not worried about the decline in address numbers; the real key is the on-chain value transfer volume. Developers all say that the quantum threat is exaggerated, so let's trust them. Don't get caught up in cyclical fluctuations; the true value lies in the eternal scarcity. I just want to know, when will this correction rebound.

View OriginalReply0