The crypto world seems prosperous, but there are dark currents beneath the surface. A saying circulating within the community - "ocean fishing" - is becoming a nightmare for more and more people.
This is no joke. This jargon refers to cross-border investigations, frozen assets, and even personal control. Some people have "struggled for half a year to get free." In the past three years, there have been over 20 publicly recorded similar cross-border cases, with 70% involving single amounts exceeding 100 million USD. By the first half of 2024, globally frozen assets due to compliance reviews surged by 180%. The harshest reality is — a person might come out, but the money? Not necessarily.
But interestingly, deep things are changing.
The Federal Reserve's attitude has flipped—from previously "firmly opposing" to now "supporting innovation". The United States has begun issuing licenses to stablecoin issuers. The UK has simply defined crypto assets as "personal property". The overall direction has quietly shifted from a "one-size-fits-all ban" to "clearing boundaries and integrating into the system".
This has created a strange tension: the ideal of decentralization is facing the reality of centralized power. For large holders, short-term pain is inevitable — funds are still floating overseas, but the regulatory net is tightening. The path to compliance is being paved, but the process of walking this path is destined to go through huge waves.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTrapper
· 2025-12-26 12:45
honestly the "remote fishing" thing is just natural selection at this point... actually if you read the regulatory frameworks, they've been signaling this for months. classic pattern recognition nobody wants to acknowledge.
Reply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 2025-12-25 11:57
Data speaks. What is behind the 180% increase in frozen assets? It is worth noting this "tension"—regulatory tightening and policy shifts happening simultaneously. From a technical perspective, this just confirms Rogoff's view in 2015 that centralized power will ultimately have to negotiate with the ideals of decentralization. The issue is not about who wins, but how painful the settlement process is.
View OriginalReply0
ChainBrain
· 2025-12-23 14:58
I've heard the term "ocean fishing" a lot... people come out and the money is gone, that's the most heartbreaking part.
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMaster
· 2025-12-23 14:58
The term "deep-sea fishing" makes my scalp tingle; a real case is right under my nose.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTrooper
· 2025-12-23 14:56
The deep-sea fishing in this situation is truly remarkable; to put it bluntly, it's just a game of play people for suckers.
Those looking to make quick money should take a look. Losing a person can be dealt with, but losing money is what truly matters.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 2025-12-23 14:54
The term "deep-sea fishing" is being heard too much these days. To put it bluntly, it's still a matter of non-compliance.
Have you ever seen someone lose everything but still have their money? It's even more despairing.
The crypto world seems prosperous, but there are dark currents beneath the surface. A saying circulating within the community - "ocean fishing" - is becoming a nightmare for more and more people.
This is no joke. This jargon refers to cross-border investigations, frozen assets, and even personal control. Some people have "struggled for half a year to get free." In the past three years, there have been over 20 publicly recorded similar cross-border cases, with 70% involving single amounts exceeding 100 million USD. By the first half of 2024, globally frozen assets due to compliance reviews surged by 180%. The harshest reality is — a person might come out, but the money? Not necessarily.
But interestingly, deep things are changing.
The Federal Reserve's attitude has flipped—from previously "firmly opposing" to now "supporting innovation". The United States has begun issuing licenses to stablecoin issuers. The UK has simply defined crypto assets as "personal property". The overall direction has quietly shifted from a "one-size-fits-all ban" to "clearing boundaries and integrating into the system".
This has created a strange tension: the ideal of decentralization is facing the reality of centralized power. For large holders, short-term pain is inevitable — funds are still floating overseas, but the regulatory net is tightening. The path to compliance is being paved, but the process of walking this path is destined to go through huge waves.