2025-12-24 16:27:21

I've seen this rhythm many times. When patience runs out and it seems like it won't drop further, everyone starts to enter the market, followed by a big waterfall. The pattern is always the same, and it always works.

My judgment on ETH remains in the range of 1800 to 2100. Using wave theory, the current decline is part of the second wave of a three-wave correction, and the retracement won't be too shallow. According to conventional rules, it typically retraces about 80% of the previous upward move, pointing to the 2000 level.

From the perspective of the retracement wave structure, I observe a standard ABC three-three-five platform-style correction, with wave C showing an extended diffusion platform pattern. This pattern usually indicates that selling pressure is gradually being released.

Interestingly, using Fibonacci extension to calculate, the target also points to around 2000—this creates a double validation. The 2000 level coincides with ETH's annual average cost basis. The resonance of multiple factors makes the support at this price level significant.

ETH0,14%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTArchaeologis

· 2025-12-27 16:27

The position at 2000... indeed has a sense of historical sedimentation. Like the recurring valuation baselines in the antique market, they are never without reason.

View OriginalReply0

YieldHunter

· 2025-12-27 01:49

ngl if you squint hard enough at the charts literally anything confirms your thesis... fibonacci retracement pointing to 2000? shocking. year-line average also 2000? what are the odds lmao. the real question is whether institutions actually give a fuck about these levels or if we're all just pattern matching at this point tbh

Reply0

DisillusiionOracle

· 2025-12-25 02:42

Coming back with this set again? I've seen it too many times, the routine never changes. --- Is 2000 really that magical? It feels like every time someone says support support support. --- Wave theory Fibonacci double verification... Bro, your combo punch really works. --- Is it over? I'm already numb. --- Every time they talk about multiple factors resonating, but in the end, it still gets broken through. --- Can the 2000 level hold? I can't bet on it. --- The worst is rushing in when patience runs out.

View OriginalReply0

LightningWallet

· 2025-12-24 16:57

It's the same harvesting pattern again, always so precise, I'm overwhelmed. The 2000 level really holds up, multiple resonances really weren't in vain.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainSleuth

· 2025-12-24 16:56

The 2000 level really has some significance, with multiple indicators pointing to it. Human nature is like that— the more you wait, the more anxious you get, and in the end, you get caught off guard. I believe in the wave theory, but bottom fishing really takes guts. Every time, they talk about support, but it always gets broken through—what do you do then? The ABC correction analysis makes sense, but the risk still feels pretty high. Multiple confirmations sound reassuring, but what if it breaks below 2000? However, I also see the 1800-2100 range this way—it's just that the time cost is too high. The pattern is indeed the same, but every time, new retail investors get caught. Fibonacci extension points to 2000—coincidence or is there a real pattern? I think we should wait for confirmation of support before acting—don't let the rhythm carry you away. This idea of the 2000-year line cost is the first time I've heard it; it's quite interesting.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinGuardian

· 2025-12-24 16:51

Is this routine again? I'm already tired of it, it's always played this way. Wait, can 2000 really hold? Feels like this wave is about to break. Wave theory combined with Fibonacci, sounds pretty impressive... But honestly, multiple indicators point to 2000, which is definitely worth paying attention to. Not trusting these technicals, I prefer to stay on the sidelines and wait for a clearer signal. Double confirmation? I feel like the more technical indicators there are, the easier it is to be deceived. Those few times the 2000 support level was hit were pretty disastrous; can we bottom out this time? The tactics are the tactics, but your analysis logic isn't bad; it all depends on whether the market buys it.

View OriginalReply0

On-ChainDiver

· 2025-12-24 16:50

The 2000 level is indeed tough; several lines are pointing to it.

View OriginalReply0