Seeing someone complain on the screen "comparing XRP and the early internet, it's just crypto circle self-hype," I couldn't help but laugh at the time. Buddy, you might really not understand what the core of this analogy is.

Today, let's be straightforward and direct: Is XRP truly worth being called the infrastructure of the "Value Internet"? As an old player who has been immersed in this circle for many years, my conclusion is—this analogy is not only plausible but might also be the most seriously underestimated perception in the crypto field over the next five years.

**First, a basic explanation for newcomers**

Forget those academic terms. Let's go back to the simplest facts: before the internet appeared, transoceanic telegrams took several days, and transmitting large files relied entirely on physical carriers like CDs and U disks. Cost? Exorbitantly high. Efficiency? Extremely low. Ordinary people wanting to access global information? Dream on.

It wasn't until the emergence of the TCP/IP protocol that the barriers between different networks were truly broken down. Information began to travel globally at low cost and high speed, which then led to the rise of the internet era. In other words, TCP/IP is the foundation of the "Information Internet"—without it, things like Google, Facebook, WeChat simply couldn't survive.

**Here's the key point**

Recently, a dialogue between two senior industry observers proposed a bold idea: the current XRP Ledger, in its fundamental function, is comparable to TCP/IP in the 1990s—all doing the same thing, just upgrading from "information flow" to "value flow."

Upon hearing this, many immediately start arguing: "A crypto asset, why compare it to the core protocol of the internet?" That's a good question, but it also precisely shows that people haven't fully grasped the essence of this matter.