2025-12-24 18:23:44

Recently, the market trend has become quite interesting. An industry insider claiming to be an agent for BTC veteran traders has recently caused quite a stir in the crypto circle, regarding the capital rotation between precious metals and Bitcoin.

This guy is a former manager of a major trading platform, and he’s quite a story himself. During the market move on December 19, the account he managed was directly floating at a loss of $78.3 million, approaching the liquidation line. It was at this delicate moment that he came out and called for Bitcoin to surge to $106,000 and Ethereum to $4,500.

Isn’t it coincidental? The timing of his statement is very deliberate. At that time, Bitcoin had just fallen below $85,000, and Ethereum dropped below $2,800, with the entire market in a bloodbath. The data was clear: global contract liquidations reached $549 million, and over 160,000 traders were forcibly liquidated. In this atmosphere of panic, a bullish voice suddenly emerged, naturally like a bomb.

His logic is as follows: Silver, palladium, and other precious metals have recently seen good gains, but mainly driven by short covering, and this upward momentum cannot last. Once the trend in precious metals adjusts, the funds chasing the trend will inevitably find new targets. His conclusion is—these funds will eventually flow into Bitcoin and Ethereum.

This prediction spread quite quickly in the crypto community, and there was a lot of discussion. From an analytical perspective, the idea of capital flowing between different assets does have a logical chain. But the problem is, if retail investors really want to follow the trend, they need to open their eyes and think carefully.

BTC1,1%

ETH2,3%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVSandwich

· 2025-12-27 14:31

Haha, the timing is perfect. Floating loss of 78.3 million and still calling for buy signals, impressive. Suddenly turning bullish when the account is at risk—can you believe this logic? Is gold flowing into the crypto market? This kind of explanation sounds a bit suspicious; retail investors shouldn't believe it too much. Capital rotation is real, but the way this guy talks has a bit of a "self-rescue" vibe. Contract loss of 549 million but still boldly claiming 106,000—gotta say, he's quite brave. Who benefits from the bullish voices at times like these? With such a large floating loss, can they be so confident? Do they truly believe or are they just panicking? Gold and precious metals adjusting capital flow into BTC? Why wasn't it so miraculous before? Honestly, the timing is too perfect. This isn't a coincidence; it's a signal.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetNomad

· 2025-12-24 18:46

Floating loss of 78.3 million still calling orders here, truly impressive. The rhythm is just too perfect haha --- Are precious metals flowing into the crypto market? Sounds like a story, but I’d rather see how his own account is doing now --- Honestly, this timing was too harsh. The logic of short covering pushing precious metals up is okay, but I don’t really believe it’s flowing into the crypto market --- It’s that "I have insider information" moment again. Every time it’s said like this, and every time someone believes it haha --- Over 500 million in liquidation and still calling for a bull? This guy’s guts are enough, or maybe he just really can’t help it --- Capital rotation definitely exists, but this brother’s predictions are a bit too coincidental. I don’t really believe it --- Approaching the liquidation line and still in the mood to call the market? Impressive, very professional --- Retail traders following these kinds of orders are almost certainly just being used as leeks by others. Be more cautious

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPrince

· 2025-12-24 18:35

Still daring to call trades despite a floating loss of 78.3 million, this guy's really got guts.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 2025-12-24 18:32

Is a $78.3 million unrealized loss still enough to calmly call the market? I've seen this tactic too many times; on-chain footprints never lie. --- The logic of capital rotation does exist, but the question is who is leading this flow, which depends on the wallet history of the original address. --- The most warning-worthy voices are those on the brink of liquidation; data speaks for itself. --- The migration of funds from precious metals to Bitcoin... I want to see the true destination of this money; it might not be that simple. --- After a $549 million liquidation, someone came out to call the market; the timing is too "coincidental." Such abnormal trading patterns should have been flagged long ago. --- Retail investors should really follow this guy's dormant wallet before blindly chasing; you might discover some interesting on-chain signals. --- No matter how beautifully a paper is written, it can't replace the real operations of an account; on-chain footprints can't be changed. --- Is the short covering of precious metals driving the rally? This logic applies equally to Bitcoin—don't be led by the rhythm. --- The most inexpensive bullish voices are especially when they come from the unrealized loss side. --- This kind of "insider prophecy" loves to use long-term cycles to cover short-term dumping; I've been watching the destination of this fund for a long time.

View OriginalReply0

HorizonHunter

· 2025-12-24 18:24

Losing 78.3 million and still dare to call the shots? This guy is really bold and daring. Isn't this logic just self-rescue? To put it nicely, it's fundamental analysis. Silver rises, so you have to dump Bitcoin? I feel that reverse operation is more stable. Retail investors are really easy to get cut by this kind of trend, they need to be more cautious. I believe in capital rotation, but the motives of those who come out shouting at this time are a bit suspicious.

View OriginalReply0