Bitcoin has already broken free from the traditional 4-year cycle constraints.



For a long time, the industry has had a consensus on Bitcoin's price movement pattern: experiencing a complete cycle approximately every 4 years—halving events trigger a new rally, followed by a peak, correction, and then entering the next cycle. This pattern has been repeatedly validated across multiple cycles and has become a basis for many investors' strategies.

But now it seems this model is failing. With the deep involvement of institutional capital, the launch of spot ETFs, and the maturation of market structure, Bitcoin's price movements are beginning to diverge from a simple time cycle framework. The market's driving factors are becoming more complex—intertwining macro liquidity, policy expectations, institutional allocation demands, and other multidimensional factors.

What does this mean? Investors need to upgrade their understanding of Bitcoin cycles. Over-reliance on historical cycle points may lead to decision biases. As market rules change, adapting to new analytical frameworks becomes an essential skill.
BTC4,31%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
BlockchainGrillervip
· 01-05 06:29
The 4-year cycle should have died long ago. Just look at the tricks that institutions are playing now.
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpertvip
· 01-04 22:14
Is the four-year cycle broken? Wake up, institutions have long been changing the game rules

---

This time is really different. The old script of halving and then rising is outdated

---

It's called an upgrade in cognition, but actually it's just who has the information to make money

---

When ETFs appeared, the game changed. Retail investors are still looking at cycles

---

Institutional liquidity > time cycles, this is the true nature of the new era

---

Stop clinging to the number four years, it's easy to get cut

---

Now Bitcoin is tightly linked to macroeconomics, the cycle theory really should retire

---

That's right, but the problem is no one has figured out the new framework

---

Institutional entry has indeed changed everything, retail investors are suffering

---

Wait, doesn't that mean my previous operation plan is all invalid?
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalistvip
· 01-02 08:56
Another new set of theories? The 4-year cycle has failed. So what's the next cycle, 3 years or 5 years?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHuntervip
· 01-02 08:34
Institutional entry, this just got interesting. The 4-year cycle theory is indeed due for retirement. Arbitrage opportunities still exist, but you need to approach them from a different perspective.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin