2026-01-03 10:25:00

Just increased the bag again.

We're looking to shake out the traders now, not wait until we're 10x higher. That's the whole point here—each phase of growth gets built on actual believers, not people hunting for quick exits.

Keep it simple: we're building with real skin in the game, not flip artists chasing the next pump.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ApeEscapeArtist

· 14h ago

Adding more to the position again, this time really going to select people.

View OriginalReply0

Anon32942

· 01-03 10:54

I really can't believe this logic. We've long needed to clear out those who only want quick money.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractWorker

· 01-03 10:48

Honestly, this is the right mindset. It's about time to shake out those who are short-term speculators, leaving only those with true conviction to go further.

View OriginalReply0

VCsSuckMyLiquidity

· 01-03 10:48

Well said, we really need to shake off those short-term traders; building a community of believers is the only future.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 01-03 10:46

the shake-out mechanics here are fascinating tbh. watch the transaction velocity spike right before these culls happen. whale clustering patterns never lie, they're already positioning for the next accumulation phase. predictable as always.

Reply0

SnapshotBot

· 01-03 10:45

Hold on tight, this is the real gameplay. Those short-term impatient traders will eventually have to get off.

View OriginalReply0

ShortingEnthusiast

· 01-03 10:41

True builders and speculators should have their own separate paths; the earlier the shakeout, the better.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-03 10:40

It has been proven that projects that filter out speculators tend to last longer. This "builder mindset" protocol architecture is indeed more stable in the long run. I previously wrote a detailed retrospective analysis about this mechanism design... But what is the key data here? What is the actual percentage of holders?

View OriginalReply0