The case for utility tokens is getting weaker when you really dig into it. Most of them? They're basically running on fumes for retail investors. Here's the thing: the majority show zero correlation with their underlying protocol's performance. Take a DEX token as an example—solid platform, genuine user traction, but the token itself? It sits disconnected from the protocol's success. That's the real problem. Holders don't actually benefit when the ecosystem thrives. No revenue share, no meaningful utility. You're holding something that doesn't ride the wave with the product. That mismatch between token value and platform growth is exactly why so many retail users stay skeptical.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DYORMaster
· 01-06 09:30
Basically, it's just that tokens are disconnected from real business, and token holders are just like leeks being harvested.
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobia
· 01-06 01:44
Basically, it's a leek relay market, and the token and the project itself have nothing to do with each other.
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomnia
· 01-05 12:53
To be honest, these utility tokens are just a facade; nobody really cares.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-03 10:54
It has proven that the decoupling of protocol performance and token price is the real poison. I have tested it across three chains, and the data doesn't lie.
View OriginalReply0
DaoDeveloper
· 01-03 10:54
this is exactly why i've been digging into tokenomics primitives lately - the disconnect between protocol revenue and token holder value is a legitimate design flaw that needs addressing through better governance mechanisms imo
Reply0
RektButStillHere
· 01-03 10:35
ngl, this is exactly what I've been wanting to say: most utility tokens are just empty shells.
View OriginalReply0
TideReceder
· 01-03 10:27
Basically, it's a paper tiger; holding the coin gets you nothing.
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 01-03 10:26
Isn't this the true portrayal of most tokens? Holding = gambling, the ecosystem explodes, and the tokens just lie there passively.
The case for utility tokens is getting weaker when you really dig into it. Most of them? They're basically running on fumes for retail investors. Here's the thing: the majority show zero correlation with their underlying protocol's performance. Take a DEX token as an example—solid platform, genuine user traction, but the token itself? It sits disconnected from the protocol's success. That's the real problem. Holders don't actually benefit when the ecosystem thrives. No revenue share, no meaningful utility. You're holding something that doesn't ride the wave with the product. That mismatch between token value and platform growth is exactly why so many retail users stay skeptical.