2026-01-03 13:21:14

Picture this scenario: someone with massive influence and deep pockets enters the NFT market, yet instead of supporting bluechip projects that holders have accumulated over years, they promote emerging collections like Milady Maker. The disconnect raises questions about market dynamics.

When influential figures pivot toward newer, speculative projects rather than established bluechip positions, it sends mixed signals to the NFT community. Market sentiment shifts accordingly. The sector struggles to build sustained momentum when capital and attention scatter across fragmented narratives instead of consolidating around proven collections.

This fragmentation reflects broader challenges facing the NFT space—the lack of consistent narrative, the challenge of coordinating buyer sentiment, and the difficulty of sustaining bull market conditions when even prominent community members redirect their backing elsewhere. Until there's stronger alignment on which projects matter most, the NFT sector may continue treading water rather than rallying.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProposalDetective

· 01-06 08:27

The big players are all playing with new projects, while blue chips are still gathering dust... This is the current state of the NFT space.

View OriginalReply0

ExpectationFarmer

· 01-04 10:51

NGL, this is a typical pump-and-dump scheme. When big players invest in new projects, it's not because they believe in the technology, but to manipulate the market and flip the assets. We retail investors are just following the trend and buying in.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 01-04 05:24

Big players are harvesting profits without even hiding it, and they even create hype to promote new projects. Truly impressive.

View OriginalReply0

GasWastingMaximalist

· 01-03 13:50

In the NFT world, when big players make a move, the entire market gets chaotic... It's really outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyValidator

· 01-03 13:49

Big Fish's new e-commerce project has blue-chip investors stunned, right?

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterZhang

· 01-03 13:49

NFT this game of chess, even the big players can't play with unity, how can retail investors survive...

View OriginalReply0

ZeroRushCaptain

· 01-03 13:49

Ha, is it the same old story? As soon as the big players enter, they change their tune. We, the old leeks, are still holding onto the blue-chip corpses. They are truly the original reverse indicator; wherever they charge, I run in the opposite direction. The NFT battlefield has long been fragmented; who can still unify their thoughts? Everyone is doing their own thing.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedAgain

· 01-03 13:33

Here comes the pump again, a big player says one word and we all follow suit. Isn't this just the rhythm of united front repeatedly being liquidated? --- A thousand gold can't buy early knowledge. Why weren't we this aggressive when going all-in on blue chips back then? --- This is hilarious. It's a signal before the lending rate soars. Watch out, another wave of forced liquidations is coming. --- This is how the NFT market is. No one dares to take a side, and as a result, everyone buys the dip only to get liquidated. --- The problem isn't fragmentation; it's that whoever's liquidation price is lowest has to run. --- Basically, there's no consensus. Everyone looks at their own risk control points, and in the end, we all end up in the hospital. --- Milady and similar speculative assets can be milked for all they're worth. Blue chip holders are bleeding, and that's their own fault. That's just the game rules. --- To add more or cut losses, that's the question we face. Fragmentation? What's the point? Only liquidation is eternal.

View OriginalReply0

rug_connoisseur