Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Bitcoin's Post-Halving Year Collapse: When Historical Patterns Meet Modern Markets
For the first time since Bitcoin’s inception, the flagship cryptocurrency concluded a year following a halving event with negative returns. The April 2024 supply reduction, which has historically triggered 12-18 months of bullish momentum, initially seemed to follow script—BTC surged to $126,000 in October before entering a sharp correction phase. Yet as 2025 closed below January’s opening price, Bitcoin shattered a pattern that had held firm through the 2012, 2016, and 2020 halvings.
The Four-Year Cycle Under Pressure
The breakdown of Bitcoin’s traditional market rhythm has ignited serious conversations about whether established trading frameworks still apply. The 2016 bitcoin price cycle, like its predecessors, benefited from predictable supply constraints driving demand. Today’s environment looks fundamentally different.
Market structure has evolved dramatically. Institutional adoption through spot ETFs, corporate treasury accumulation, and algorithmic trading now overshadow the retail-driven dynamics of previous cycles. As analyst Armando Pantoja notes, these new players operate by different rules—institutional capital responds to macroeconomic conditions, interest rates, and regulatory signals rather than simple halving calendars.
Bitcoin no longer trades in isolation. The asset has matured into a macro-sensitive instrument, fluctuating alongside broader financial markets. When liquidity tightens globally or geopolitical tensions rise, BTC bleeds regardless of supply mechanics. This represents a structural shift that older cycle models failed to anticipate.
Institutional Growth Meets Macro Headwinds
Throughout 2025, Bitcoin experienced conflicting forces. ETF inflows demonstrated sustained institutional appetite, yet macroeconomic pressures consistently weighed on risk assets. This divergence—strong demand colliding with market-wide deleveraging—exemplifies the new trading regime.
Long-time industry observer Simon Dixon echoes this assessment, declaring the traditional four-year cycle obsolete and signaling Bitcoin’s entry into uncharted territory. The halving mechanism remains relevant, but its influence has diminished as mining financing diversifies and network dynamics evolve beyond pure supply scarcity.
Downside Targets and Capitulation Fears
The October peak of $126,000 now appears distant as BTC retreated over 30% in subsequent months. Current trading near $92.70K has sparked warnings from market analysts who believe capitulation remains incomplete.
Bearish commentators point to $60,000-$70,000 as plausible support zones, arguing that the correction cycle has further to run. This perspective rests on the notion that institutional positions still require shakeout, and retail confidence needs genuine capitulation to reset sentiment.
The 2025 close represents more than a statistical aberration—it signals that Bitcoin’s price discovery mechanism has fundamentally transformed. Whether this restructuring eventually leads to stronger, more sustainable rallies or marks the beginning of prolonged range-bound consolidation remains an open question for traders parsing the wreckage of broken patterns.