2026-01-06 09:26:31

Recently, voices from the financial industry and market analysts have begun to focus. SEC management, well-known analyst Tom Lee, and other industry observers have expressed optimism about Bitcoin's prospects, reflecting the reality of continuous institutional capital inflows.

From a technical perspective, the trend pattern is quite clean— the cyclical nature of bull and bear markets indicates that Bitcoin has never experienced two consecutive years of decline. Currently, the $93k level may represent the final window for entry.

Market cleansing has largely been completed, and mainstream capital deployment is becoming increasingly evident. The actions of institutions are also accelerating: targeting $150k around 2026 and even challenging $250k, which, based on cycle laws and capital fundamentals, is not an impossible dream.

Of course, timing always tests patience more than price itself. The choices made at this moment often determine regrets for the coming year.

BTC-1,17%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProtocolRebel

· 3h ago

Is 93k really the last chance to get in? We said the same thing last year... --- Institutions are entering the market convincingly, but retail investors are still being harvested as always. --- 250k is a bit of a stretch, but I believe in 150k; the cycle law is right there. --- It's the same old rhetoric, let's wait and see. Anyway, I don't dare to add anything right now. --- Tom Lee says he's bullish? Has this guy's prediction ever been accurate lol. --- I like the saying "timing is more important than price," but the problem is no one can get it right. --- Is the washout complete? The market is still testing. Don't get too confident.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiHarvester

· 01-06 09:56

93k really is the last train to get on, miss this wave and you'll lose big next year. Whatever Tom Lee says, I believe it. Anyway, I've already gone all in. 250k is just a dream... Anyway, I believe it. Better to gamble than regret later. Institutions are accumulating, I have to follow suit, or I'll just be the next chives again. This cycle really feels like it's here, what am I waiting for to get on board? They say this at the last window every year, but I still jumped in haha.

View OriginalReply0

ContractSurrender

· 01-06 09:49

Is 93k really the last chance to get in? Feels like they say this every time. --- Tom Lee is at it again, claiming this time is different? I don't believe it anymore. --- 250k sounds great, but how many will still be around in 2026? --- "Timing is more important than price" — a nice phrase, but no one remembers when things go south. --- Does institutional entry mean we can make money? Haha, the bagholders will always be us. --- Is the cleanup finished? Feels like we're cutting losses every day. --- As soon as these articles come out, the opposite side of the trade ends up making money. --- I believe in 150k, but 250k is just wishful thinking. --- Here we go again, next time it probably has to wait until 300k for the "final window."

View OriginalReply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 01-06 09:45

93k is still hesitating about what, institutions are already laying in wait --- Tom Lee says it looks good, but we have to see the subsequent trend. Repeating history doesn't mean the future will be the same --- 250k? Let's see if we can survive to 150k first --- Every time it's said to be the final window, and next time when it drops lower, it's said again... --- I've heard "the washout is complete" too many times --- Patience? My patience has already been washed out --- 2026? Brother, if I can survive until next year, that would be good enough --- Institutions are really deploying, but when retail investors get involved, they always buy at high levels --- Is $93k really the last chance? It feels like every price level has been mentioned before --- The market looks good on the surface, but could this wave be another trap to lure in more?

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithAPlan

· 01-06 09:45

Is 93k really the last chance to get in? Every time I hear this, I laugh. --- Institutions are accumulating, while we are hesitating. That’s the gap. --- 250k... Just listen, don’t really believe it. --- Tom Lee says it’s good, so it must be good? I still prefer to watch the capital flow. --- The washout was a joke; it still has to fall further. --- The saying "timing is more important than price" really hit me... Unfortunately, I can never get it right. --- Should I buy at 93k or wait? Anyway, regret is unavoidable. --- Historical patterns often slap you in the face when you trust them the most. --- From 150k to 250k, the dream is still quite affordable. --- Honestly, anyone who dares to go all-in now is just a leek (retail investor). --- Wait, do you really believe institutions have finished their布局? --- It’s the same old story... I just ask, will it still fall to 80k before 150k? --- The regret for next year isn’t just about today’s choices; luck also plays a big role.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 01-06 09:41

Is 93k really the last chance to get in? Feels like it's always said this way every time. --- Tom Lee is back to hype it up again. Whether institutions are really putting real money in depends on the future trend. --- Wait, two years in a row without a dip? Then what about 2022? --- 250k? Let's stabilize 93k first before we start bragging haha. --- Again with "regret if missed next year," I've heard this line for three years. Let's see who really invests money. --- What does faster institutional layout mean? Still a bunch of people just hyping each other? --- Timing > Price. That's correct, but the question is who can hit the mark precisely. --- $150k is not a dream, but what if the dream ends? --- Does a completed washout necessarily mean a rise? I feel this logic is a bit flimsy.

View OriginalReply0