An interesting phenomenon regarding the Lit airdrop is worth noting. The project team claims not to have partnered with any other exchanges, yet there are already multiple contracts launched by market-making teams in the market. There is a game theory at play here: airdrop recipients cash out on the secondary market, while contract trading shifts to other platforms. From the project's perspective, such dispersed liquidity can actually be beneficial—on one hand, when the airdrop faces pressure, the project team can gradually accumulate more tokens; on the other hand, price volatility caused by leveraged trading creates a foundation for subsequent price increases. Another way to understand this is: profits are always a transfer relationship—your profit point might just be someone else's participation window. In this kind of game, understanding the true intentions of market participants is often more important than following the herd.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHarvester
· 01-09 16:27
Airdrop party has a set of talking points, but they've already laid out their plans behind the scenes, haha.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 01-09 13:10
Playing word games again, I've seen this kind of rhetoric from the project team too many times.
View OriginalReply0
SorryRugPulled
· 01-06 16:53
It's the same old story, the project team doesn't tell a single truth.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92
· 01-06 16:53
Basically, it's just a scheme to harvest retail investors; the project team says one thing publicly but does another behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 01-06 16:47
It's the same trick again. Once you see through it, it's all just empty.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntress
· 01-06 16:40
I've seen this kind of excuse from project teams too many times. They claim there's no cooperation, but behind the scenes, the team is manipulating the market. The logical flaws are so obvious they could drive a carriage.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarber
· 01-06 16:39
Basically, it's just a scheme to harvest retail investors, continuing to play under a different disguise.
An interesting phenomenon regarding the Lit airdrop is worth noting. The project team claims not to have partnered with any other exchanges, yet there are already multiple contracts launched by market-making teams in the market. There is a game theory at play here: airdrop recipients cash out on the secondary market, while contract trading shifts to other platforms. From the project's perspective, such dispersed liquidity can actually be beneficial—on one hand, when the airdrop faces pressure, the project team can gradually accumulate more tokens; on the other hand, price volatility caused by leveraged trading creates a foundation for subsequent price increases. Another way to understand this is: profits are always a transfer relationship—your profit point might just be someone else's participation window. In this kind of game, understanding the true intentions of market participants is often more important than following the herd.