Telegram founder clarifies: $1.7 billion in latest bond financing is completely independent and unrelated to Russian capital

2026-01-07 01:26:12

[Chain Wen] Telegram founder Pavel Durov recently posted a statement in response to some recent questions. He clearly pointed out that, from a capital structure perspective, Telegram has no connection to Russia. Most importantly — the $1.7 billion bond financing just completed did not involve any Russian investors.

Regarding the bonds issued earlier in 2021, Durov stated that they have been mostly repaid and there are no issues. He emphasized a commonly confused point: bondholders and shareholders are two different concepts. Currently, the only shareholder of Telegram remains himself.

It is worth noting that there were reports earlier claiming that Telegram’s $500 million bonds in Russia were frozen due to Western sanctions. Durov’s recent statement essentially clarifies Telegram’s independence in platform financing and the stability of its core equity structure. This is a key clarification for the Web3 community and users who rely on the Telegram ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MindsetExpander

· 01-09 17:26

Coming again to clarify? Feels like over-explaining haha --- Too many people can't distinguish between bonds and equity, Durov's response this time is a textbook example --- $1.7 billion in independent financing, now the sanctions discussion can rest --- Wait, what about the $500 million frozen? Not a word? --- Those in the know understand, this is just to keep the ecosystem alive --- The shareholder is only himself, I believe that, at least Telegram is tough enough in this regard --- The independence of financing is now guaranteed, let's see how the retention ability performs

View OriginalReply0

SelfCustodyBro

· 01-09 16:01

You really need to distinguish clearly between bonds and equity, or you'll easily be led astray.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiGreenie

· 01-09 15:59

Separating bonds and equity—someone finally explained it clearly. Those previous news reports really mixed things up. Here comes another clarification about Russia relations; the frequency is a bit high. Independently raising 1.7 billion USD in funding—believe it or not, I'm only half convinced. Durov's recent statement was quite forceful; it seems he's really annoyed by the criticism. The move to hold exclusive ownership rights is quite solid. Being able to raise funds amid sanctions storms shows this platform's resilience is truly strong.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 01-07 01:56

Here we go again with the clarification, claiming that the $1.7 billion bond has nothing to do with Russia—can we really believe that? Still firmly believe in Telegram's independence; Durov's recent response was quite forceful. The bond and equity are clearly separated, meaning as long as he still holds shares, it's stable—this logic I understand. By the way, what exactly happened to the $500 million Western sanctions? This part wasn't explained clearly. Financial independence = safety? Feels like trying to add a new phrase to cover up the issue. It's ridiculous—being scrutinized every day. Durov, you need to release more clarification posts.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysAnon

· 01-07 01:55

Still explaining your innocence, huh? Looks like the pressure is pretty high.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoGoldmine

· 01-07 01:55

1.7 billion bond financing, 0 Russian capital, this ROI logical chain is indeed clear. From a computational thinking perspective, the independence of financing is like reducing the risk factor of mining, and increased stability means the expected return cycle for long-term holding can be clearly estimated. Quite interesting.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichVictim

· 01-07 01:55

Are you blaming others again? The real problem is the confusion between bonds and equity.

View OriginalReply0

BankruptcyArtist

· 01-07 01:52

Still clarifying Russia relations, I've heard this explanation too many times before --- Is the $1.7 billion financing independence true or false? --- Has the 2021 bonds been fully repaid? Then what's up with the frozen $500 million, this logic is a bit messy --- To put it nicely, the shareholder is only himself, but who would believe that --- Wait, bondholders are not the same as shareholders, I need to think about this more --- Financing independence... sounds like it's making excuses for something --- Durov is getting urgent? Keep posting clarifications, which indeed indicates there are issues --- Telegram really is quite a handful, how much regulatory pressure must there be --- So in the end, it just means: I have no Russian parent, I am very independent? Fine then --- Hmm... $1.7 billion completely without Russian capital? Feels a bit forced

View OriginalReply0

MissedTheBoat

· 01-07 01:52

This explanation sounds a bit rushed, the more you explain, the more it seems like there's really something there...

View OriginalReply0

BankruptWorker

· 01-07 01:30

Here we go again clarifying Russia's matters, it really never ends.

View OriginalReply0