Brand partnerships in crypto have entered a new phase—and that's actually a sign of maturation, not decline.



Remember when every major brand collab would trigger instant hype cycles? A few years ago, seeing Adobe partnering with an NFT project would've sent traders rushing to buy. Charts would spike. Social feeds would explode. Today? The market barely flinches.

But here's the thing: that apathy isn't a failure. It's evolution.

What's changed is that CT (crypto Twitter) has stopped conflating brand visibility with token utility. The candles don't pump anymore because the market learned that aesthetics alone don't move fundamentals. A collaboration with a household name doesn't guarantee liquidity or adoption if there's no real ecosystem value behind it.

The brands that matter now? They're the ones building infrastructure, not just slapping logos on NFTs. The partnerships worth noticing are those driving genuine user adoption and solving actual problems.

So when big names partner with Web3 projects today and there's no immediate price action—that's not disappointment. That's the market growing up. Brand equity still matters. It always will. But now it has to earn its place alongside substance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TheShibaWhisperervip
· 01-20 03:24
Nah, this is the real deal. Those big-name collaborations before were just pure air pump. Now that no one is buying into it, it actually shows that the market has matured. I think so.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessGweivip
· 01-20 00:32
Well said, finally someone sees through it. Those brand collaborations that only ride the hype are indeed coming to an end; the market isn't stupid.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecodervip
· 01-17 07:10
According to research, this article touches on a core point — from a technical perspective, the reason early brand collaborations can drive prices is fundamentally due to market inefficiency caused by information asymmetry. Data shows that the FOMO premium for NFT brand collaborations decreased from an average of 200% in 2021-2022 to less than 5%, which is a sign of market rationalization. It is worth noting that this is not a decline, but an optimization of the signaling mechanism.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58vip
· 01-17 05:54
To be honest, Bitcoin should have been like this a long time ago. Big-name collaborations not increasing prices actually indicate that the market has matured. It sounds nice to say, but it's meaningless... Truly implementable projects have already been buried in announcements.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8bvip
· 01-17 05:50
That's right. The era when people would go all-in just because of a big brand partnership is indeed over. Nowadays, no one gets excited over a logo; instead, they focus on what real problems can be solved... That's what you call rationality.
View OriginalReply0
RuntimeErrorvip
· 01-17 05:49
In simple terms, the retail investors have woken up and are no longer being fooled by endorsements from big brands.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapyvip
· 01-17 05:36
I'm already tired of this fake prosperity of "big brand collaborations." Now the market finally has some sense.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 01-17 05:33
Haha, someone finally said it. The brand side has also learned to be smart.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnetvip
· 01-17 05:30
Honestly, this analysis is a bit naive. Market growing up? Probably just pretending to be deep while actually experiencing a volume exhaustion...
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)