Aviation and tech leaders are at odds over pricing strategy for in-flight connectivity solutions. The low-cost carrier executive raised concerns about the cost structure of satellite-based broadband services on aircraft, while the satellite internet entrepreneur defended the value proposition. Their disagreement highlights the growing tension between operational economics in traditional industries and next-generation tech deployment. The debate centers on whether premium connectivity services can achieve mainstream adoption in price-sensitive markets, or if providers must adjust their business models to scale adoption across commercial aviation. Industry observers note this clash reflects broader questions about how emerging infrastructure technologies get priced as they transition from niche to mass-market applications.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SlowLearnerWangvip
· 01-20 01:22
Ha, it's the same old story again... The budget airline CEO complains about high prices, the satellite internet startup guy claims it's valuable. It just hit me now—this is nothing but a century-long showdown between the "tech-savvy" and the "stingy" factions.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityJestervip
· 01-19 23:14
Haha, the airline company and satellite network people are arguing with each other. Ultimately, it's all about money... Low-cost airlines are just cheap. Why should they spend more money just to get internet access?
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSocietyvip
· 01-19 20:51
The satellite network team really just wants to use traditional aviation as a scapegoat. This pricing logic is the same as my contract liquidation logic—anyway, as long as someone takes the bait.
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYearsvip
· 01-18 14:24
Basically, satellite network companies want to make money, and budget airlines don't want to spend money... These two will never agree.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTradervip
· 01-17 05:58
Is internet access on flights still this expensive? Budget airline guys are right; this price is unaffordable for ordinary people.
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalystvip
· 01-17 05:57
Satellite internet this wave indeed has the flavor of a pump-and-dump. Low-cost airlines have backed down, indicating that the ceiling is clear. All you leeks, pay attention to risk control [thinking]
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamervip
· 01-17 05:53
Haha, isn't this just an old story? Three years ago, when Bitcoin wasn't widespread yet, I said—new technology never dies because it's expensive; rather, when it's too cheap, no one believes in it... As for satellite internet, the current debate is about valuation, similar to arguing over air coins. Once it truly expands, you'll realize how cheap the so-called "high price" was back then.
View OriginalReply0
DEXRobinHoodvip
· 01-17 05:50
Airlines want to take advantage, satellite network providers are unwilling to lower prices... Basically, it's the same old story of traditional industries refusing to admit their mistakes. They insist on waiting until technology becomes dirt cheap before willing to adopt it. If this continues, nothing innovative will come out of it.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguyvip
· 01-17 05:48
It went all the way up to the sky, cheap airlines don't want to pay for the internet speed, really.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmivip
· 01-17 05:35
Airlines are stingy, satellite networks want to make a profit, and these two will never see eye to eye. Low-cost carriers want to save money, which is understandable, but users also don't want to go broke over in-flight internet... compromises are necessary.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)