2026-01-17 05:28:55

This actually reflects a core issue — the Web3 ecosystem indeed needs truly decentralized social platforms. Although Kaito still has many areas to improve, directly banning the platform is clearly not the solution. Giving users the right to choose and allowing projects to compete in an open environment is the true meaning of decentralization. Instead of forcibly shutting down, it's better to let the market and community make the judgment.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AltcoinTherapist

· 01-20 03:45

The whole idea of banning is really outdated. What about the original intention of decentralization?

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuilder

· 01-19 04:24

Banning this set is really pointless; open competition is the way to go.

View OriginalReply0

SocialFiQueen

· 01-17 05:59

What’s the point of calling it decentralization if you just ban it like this? That's funny.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_fish

· 01-17 05:57

That's right, centralized suppression really deserves to be condemned. If it weren't for these platforms constantly insisting on "my say so," Web3 wouldn't be such a mess.

View OriginalReply0

FarmHopper

· 01-17 05:55

Well said. Centralized platforms are still playing the old tricks. Isn't this just about controlling the narrative? The meaning of decentralization is being completely undermined.

View OriginalReply0

WalletsWatcher

· 01-17 05:49

That's right, centralized bans are outdated in Web3.

View OriginalReply0

nft_widow

· 01-17 05:35

Banning this trick is really old, decentralization is still here, and centralized is still centralized.

View OriginalReply0