Here's a thought worth sitting with: AI doesn't determine your direction—it just makes execution faster. You can optimize processes all day, but if your strategy is off, you're just getting to the wrong destination quicker. In markets, we often see projects chase AI adoption as a shortcut to legitimacy. Wrong move. The real edge isn't the tools; it's knowing where you're actually headed. AI is a multiplier of existing choices, not a replacement for vision. That's the gap most miss.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Fren_Not_Food
· 01-19 21:25
That's right, many projects just use AI as a cover-up, but essentially they haven't figured out what they really want to do. If the direction is wrong, no matter how much optimization is done, it's all in vain.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossiper
· 01-19 20:51
That's so true. Many projects just use AI as a gimmick, but haven't really thought through the direction.
View OriginalReply0
BoredApeResistance
· 01-19 02:41
Moving in the wrong direction, no matter how fast, is pointless. Too many people in the Web3 community haven't figured this out.
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBro
· 01-17 06:00
That's right, but I see too many projects doing the same — putting on an AI disguise to scam for funding, but the direction itself is already off. What's the use of accelerating wrong decisions?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFries
· 01-17 05:58
Exactly right, that's why so many projects that tout AI are still dead; if the direction is wrong, even the most powerful tools are useless.
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarker
· 01-17 05:58
ngl this is just cope for people without direction tbh. seen too many "we have vision" teams still burning cash at same rate lol
Reply0
CryptoCrazyGF
· 01-17 05:54
Exactly right, many projects just use AI as a gimmick and have no idea what they actually want to do.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 01-17 05:42
You're right, many projects just use AI as a gimmick, but in the end, it's still a pile of shit.
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCritic
· 01-17 05:41
Exactly right, just like those projects that crazily pile up AI concepts but don't think through the economic model, ultimately failing on sustainability. Tools are always just tools.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugs
· 01-17 05:32
Exactly right, a bunch of projects just jump on the AI hype without really thinking about what they want to do.
Here's a thought worth sitting with: AI doesn't determine your direction—it just makes execution faster. You can optimize processes all day, but if your strategy is off, you're just getting to the wrong destination quicker. In markets, we often see projects chase AI adoption as a shortcut to legitimacy. Wrong move. The real edge isn't the tools; it's knowing where you're actually headed. AI is a multiplier of existing choices, not a replacement for vision. That's the gap most miss.