Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
BlockBeats News, January 17 — The head of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee stated in a letter to the Senate Banking Committee that the "Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act" would weaken federal regulations on money transfer oversight and should not be included in legislation governing the crypto market structure. Senate Judiciary Committee Republican Chairman Chuck Grassley and lead Democratic Senator Dick Durbin wrote in the letter that Section 604 of the Banking Committee's Market Structure Act — which aims to protect software developers from criminal liability due to third-party misuse of their products — would "weaken" federal laws concerning unlicensed money transfer businesses. "The Senate Judiciary Committee (which has jurisdiction over Title 18 of the U.S. Code) was not consulted, nor was it given the opportunity to review the proposed changes in advance." The letter cites the case of the Department of Justice prosecuting Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm, claiming that the case demonstrates that prosecutors have sufficiently argued the importance of holding accountable those involved in unlicensed money transfer activities under current regulations. This letter is another blow to the Market Structure Act; the Senate Banking Committee was scheduled to debate and vote on the bill on Thursday but canceled the agenda late Wednesday night amid growing opposition. If this clause remains in the bill, the Judiciary Committee (which handles legal matters) will need to sign off as the third committee on the overall proposal, adding further complexity to the legislative process. DeFi advocates insist that without these specific protections, they may withdraw their support, signaling another difficult deadlock. The letter emphasizes: "Therefore, we urge the committee to reject any proposed provisions that could weaken the government's ability to hold accountable those involved in unlicensed money transfer activities, including Section 604."