#数字资产市场动态 Japan's rare earths trial mining at 6,000 meters underwater looks like a technological breakthrough, but in reality, it reflects a major country's resource anxiety.
Japan's dependence on imported rare earths exceeds 90%. The true purpose of this deep-sea mining attempt is to break this passive situation. But the problem is: deep-sea mining costs are over ten times higher than land-based mining. The current trial has only extracted kilogram-level rare earth oxides, and it will take more than 10 years to reach commercial production.
What's more painful is that 90% of the world's rare earth separation and refining technology is controlled by a few countries. Even if you dig up the ore, the subsequent smelting and processing stages are still subject to others.
Adding to the challenge is environmental protection—disturbing deep-sea sediments could cause ecological damage, which has already attracted opposition from multiple countries. In the short term, this trial mining is more of a strategic signal and is unlikely to truly change the global rare earth landscape; in the long term, overcoming technological barriers, cost pressures, and environmental restrictions are all necessary, and success remains uncertain. Deep-sea mining is destined to be a long journey.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ClassicDumpster
· 01-20 05:59
Japan's approach is really a bit of "pulling up seedlings to help them grow," digging for kilogram-level rare earths at ten times the cost? I can't figure out how this is even remotely cost-effective.
The most critical bottleneck is still that 90% purification technology. What's the use? Even after mining, it still depends on others' approval.
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrender
· 01-20 05:51
Starting from 10 years? This isn't mining, it's just making empty promises.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedElder
· 01-18 08:54
This is the resource curse. You can mine it but can't use it, and you have to rely on others' favor to grind the powder. A decade of wasting time.
View OriginalReply0
WalletInspector
· 01-17 06:30
Is it possible to commercialize in 10 years? Japan is digging its own grave.
---
Basically, having mines is useless; the rest of the work still depends on who you face.
---
Deep-sea mining costs are skyrocketing; no matter how you calculate it, it's not cost-effective.
---
The bottleneck is always refining technology; digging more mud is pointless.
---
Environmental issues lead to work stoppages as soon as they arise, which is indeed quite challenging.
---
Breaking the passive state? Feels like self-comfort, with a dependency level still at 90%.
---
Trading ten times the cost for a few kilograms of rare earths—can this business really be done?
---
Instead of deep-sea mining, it's better to negotiate; technology is the real trump card.
---
It's just strategic signaling; can we see actual output?
---
Multiple countries oppose environmental destruction; Japan is really provoking public outrage.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanboy42
· 01-17 06:25
Basically, it's just throwing money around to make a show, and after 10 years, there's still no progress.
View OriginalReply0
GovernancePretender
· 01-17 06:10
I thought about it, and this is just a gimmick to cut leeks. Ten times the cost and waiting ten years, by then maybe the new energy sector will have already switched to a different track.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkie
· 01-17 06:01
Basically, it's just that it can't be mined out; the technical bottleneck is right there.
#数字资产市场动态 Japan's rare earths trial mining at 6,000 meters underwater looks like a technological breakthrough, but in reality, it reflects a major country's resource anxiety.
Japan's dependence on imported rare earths exceeds 90%. The true purpose of this deep-sea mining attempt is to break this passive situation. But the problem is: deep-sea mining costs are over ten times higher than land-based mining. The current trial has only extracted kilogram-level rare earth oxides, and it will take more than 10 years to reach commercial production.
What's more painful is that 90% of the world's rare earth separation and refining technology is controlled by a few countries. Even if you dig up the ore, the subsequent smelting and processing stages are still subject to others.
Adding to the challenge is environmental protection—disturbing deep-sea sediments could cause ecological damage, which has already attracted opposition from multiple countries. In the short term, this trial mining is more of a strategic signal and is unlikely to truly change the global rare earth landscape; in the long term, overcoming technological barriers, cost pressures, and environmental restrictions are all necessary, and success remains uncertain. Deep-sea mining is destined to be a long journey.