2026-01-17 06:25:54

When it comes to Web3 storage, there's an unavoidable pain point—the outbound bandwidth fees from AWS.

Ironically, after all these years of shouting "decentralization," the most painful expense in project teams' financial reports is still the "traffic bill" paid to a major cloud service provider. When storing data, it’s all smiles; but when trying to read out trained AI models or 4K videos for users, that cost makes it clear what it means to be "data-locked."

Walrus's strength lies in redefining "read costs." Using the Red Stuff mechanism to break files into countless small Blobs, Walrus enables all network nodes to share the traffic load, completely breaking the single-point billing model of centralized servers. In other words, a video platform running on Walrus won't see bandwidth costs skyrocket exponentially with user growth—instead, they are naturally diluted by the decentralized network.

This counterintuitive design of "the more traffic, the cheaper it gets" truly empowers startup teams drained by traffic fees to make a decisive break from the Web2 paradigm.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PretendingToReadDocs

· 01-20 05:57

This really hits the sore spot of Web3. To put it simply, it's like changing a disguise but still having to work for Amazon.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 01-19 13:52

Another story of being drained by AWS... Where's the decentralization we promised? In the end, we still have to pay the Americans an "intelligence tax."

View OriginalReply0

CryptoHistoryClass

· 01-17 06:55

*checks historical bandwidth pricing charts* ...yeah, this is giving 2017 IPFS energy. everyone promised the same thing back then too lol

Reply0

ForkPrince

· 01-17 06:53

Finally, someone has hit the nail on the head. The bandwidth fees on AWS can really drive people crazy. This is true decentralization; otherwise, it's just Web2 pretending to be decentralized to prolong its life.

View OriginalReply0

GovernancePretender

· 01-17 06:52

Finally, someone dares to tell the truth. Previously, those project teams were touting decentralization while secretly paying AWS, it's so embarrassing.

View OriginalReply0

MoodFollowsPrice

· 01-17 06:48

Finally, someone hit the nail on the head. AWS bills can really drive people crazy.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBarbecue

· 01-17 06:31

Laughing out loud, finally someone dares to speak out about AWS's behind-the-scenes manipulation. A bunch of projects are still bragging about decentralization there. --- Walrus really packs a punch, and bandwidth costs have actually decreased? This is the Web3 I want. --- Anyone who has been drained by traffic bills can understand that sense of despair. Someone should have taken care of this a long time ago. --- The redstuff mechanism that fragments files is brilliant—truly a decentralized approach. --- No matter how loudly they shouted in previous years, in the end, they still had to pay AWS. That contrast is truly ironic. --- The more traffic, the cheaper it gets? It's the other way around now. This logic has some substance. --- Finally able to shake off the single-point pressure from centralized nodes. It was about time to do it this way. --- But can Walrus really be used commercially? It sounds a bit too idealistic. --- The startup team really hit the pain point—traffic fees can literally kill a project. --- Decentralization hasn't been achieved yet. First, we need to get rid of the exploitation by cloud service providers. Walrus might be a way out.

View OriginalReply0