2026-01-17 06:28:43

TRB may not dominate in all dimensions, but when it comes to "extreme decentralization" and "permissionless," it truly has no rivals.

Let's first review the advantages of Tellor (TRB) from four perspectives.

**First is permissionless quote rights**

Chainlink and Pyth follow a whitelist approach—nodes are verified institutions or data providers, ensuring stability but with very high entry barriers. TRB is completely different; as long as you have tokens and can run open-source code, you can become a data provider, with zero verification and zero authorization. In one sentence, TRB is the Bitcoin of oracles.

**Second is resistance to censorship**

API3 and Pyth are highly dependent on specific data sources. If these sources are cut off, the entire system is crippled. But TRB’s data sources are open. Even if 90% of professional nodes go offline due to regulation, war, or sanctions, as long as there is someone worldwide running reporting code, the protocol continues to operate. This resilience is unique in extreme environments.

**Third is flexible custom data**

Different chains and business scenarios have vastly different data needs. TRB users can customize any data type and quote rules, whereas other solutions are often limited by preset data directories.

From this perspective, TRB has indeed taken a completely different path from mainstream oracles.

TRB0,53%

LINK0,46%

PYTH-0,55%

API30,55%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenTaxonomist

· 01-20 03:46

honestly the "bitcoin of oracles" framing is taxonomically convenient but statistically speaking, let me pull up my spreadsheet on actual uptime data across extreme conditions... the resilience claims need systematic risk assessment beyond hypotheticals. 90% node failure scenarios remain evolutionary dead-ends in practice.

Reply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-19 15:42

Bitcoin-style oracles sound quite robust. But whether they can truly resist censorship depends on how many people actually use them.

View OriginalReply0

SundayDegen

· 01-19 12:49

Wow, this is true decentralization. The logic of Bitcoin has been applied to the oracle.

View OriginalReply0

PumpDetector

· 01-17 06:58

ngl, that permissionless angle is the actual differentiator here... rest feels like standard marketing noise tbh

Reply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 01-17 06:55

Sounds good, but I heard similar words back in 2018... At that time, many projects were hyping up as the "decentralization killer," and now? They're lying in the graveyard. TRB has indeed survived until today, which shows some capability, but don't jump to conclusions too early about the word "extreme."

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSurvivor

· 01-17 06:46

Ah, TRB is essentially about truly returning power to the users. I'm already tired of the Chainlink whitelist system.

View OriginalReply0

ContractBugHunter

· 01-17 06:37

This logic makes sense... but is Chainlink's monopoly really that easy to shake?

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxAddict

· 01-17 06:31

The analogy of Bitcoin in the oracle is brilliant; true permissionless systems are what Web3 should look like.