#现实世界资产代币化 Seeing the dispute between Neo's two founders, my first reaction isn't to pick a side but to recall the days when I was cut by various "ecosystem storms." Internal conflicts within projects, dispersed foundation authority, opaque fund flows—these are the issues that ultimately hurt retail investors the most.

But Zhang Zhengwen's words made me pause and think: "Short-term controversies will eventually pass, and what truly determines the future direction is continuous delivery, active collaboration, and practical applications." This may sound like deflecting blame, but from another perspective, it's a key signal for identifying a project's lifecycle. What do reliable teams emphasize during turbulent times? Not excuses or accusations, but continuing to build—Neo4's design, RWA ecosystem, cross-chain interoperability—all are progressing.

Tokenization of real-world assets fundamentally aims to bring real value onto the chain. What does this require? Not a perfect team, but ongoing technological iteration and real-world implementation. A project that can continue delivering amidst controversy is more promising than one that remains stagnant despite harmony.

Of course, I won't let my vigilance down. Financial disclosures, checks and balances, transparency—these remain my bottom line when selecting long-term targets. But this recent storm has strengthened my conviction: rather than gossiping about team scandals, focusing on actual product progress is the key to longevity.