2026-01-17 07:22:33

Major adjustments have been made to the revenue sharing mechanism for creators on social media platforms. According to the latest policies, creators' expected earnings have doubled compared to last year, but the review standards have also been upgraded.

The platform now places greater emphasis on genuine user engagement, especially the actual viewing time of paid members — this has become the core metric for revenue sharing calculations. What does this mean? Long-form content and high-quality videos are becoming particularly popular, and in-depth creation can unlock greater earning potential.

It is worth noting that the previous tactics of profiting through comment interactions have become largely ineffective. The platform now only recognizes exposure from homepage recommendations, which requires content creators to adjust their strategies — simple topic interactions can no longer be converted into revenue.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PumpingCroissant

· 01-20 06:45

Doubling growth? I feel like it's just another round of cutting leeks, every time the review standards upgrade, it's tightening the loopholes. I predicted this wave of failed topic interactions early on; the platform just wants everyone to compete on content quality. Who still wants to do in-depth creation? It's exhausting. Homepage recommendations are the real gold mine; we need to figure out how to get trending. This policy isn't very friendly to small creators. Everyone wants to produce long-form high-quality content, but what about the costs? It seems the platform is really working on optimizing the ecosystem, but I still feel a bit sorry for those veteran brothers who rely on interactions to make a living. Paying for browsing time as a metric? That means creating stickiness, and the tactics are just upgrading again.

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizedElder

· 01-20 01:55

Doubling your returns sounds great, but how many actually get to enjoy it? The issue of failed topic interactions has been obvious for a while; it still depends on solid content quality. It's another platform of constant review upgrades and metric changes—really keeps things busy. Deep creation? Man, I’m struggling even to choose topics now, let alone doing something this complex. Homepage recommendations are still unpredictable; who knows when the algorithm will go haywire. Looks like I need to rethink my strategy; the old approach just isn't working anymore. Doubling your earnings? Better to see if you can make it to the homepage first. Session duration is king, which means trash content will be completely phased out—that's a good thing.

View OriginalReply0

MissedTheBoat

· 01-17 07:52

Here comes the harvest again, doubling growth? That's for the top creators, right? --- The algorithm has changed again, now it depends on duration to get views. Short video creators, get ready to cry. --- Interaction tricks are no longer effective? Laughable. The platform just wants high-quality content for free. --- It sounds like a disguised way to lower the income of mid-tier creators. --- Homepage recommendations are truly competitive; we're back to the era where traffic is king. --- Doubling growth looks good on data, but can you actually get half of it in your hands? --- Long-form content is popular? That means we have to spend more time creating. --- I don't dislike this direction; finally, encouraging substantive content. --- Comment interaction is no longer effective. From now on, I need to take content seriously. --- Paid membership duration becoming a core metric aligns well with the platform's money-grabbing logic.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 01-17 07:51

ah so they're finally migrating from engagement theater to actual value extraction... watch the basis points shift real quick when algorithms start pricing dwell time properly instead of just counting vanity metrics. mev moment but make it social lmao

Reply0

VitalikFanAccount

· 01-17 07:41

Doubling growth sounds great, but there are only a few who can really benefit from it. To put it simply, platforms want to squeeze out the water; that old interaction routine really needs to die. Long content kills people, no time, brothers. Homepage recommendations? Ha, the algorithm is trying new tricks again. Making paid membership viewing time the core? This is forcing creators to produce content farms. Good quality is useless; even if recommended, it's still a waste. After all this, it's still up to the platform's mood; nothing has changed.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter_9000

· 01-17 07:37

Doubling growth sounds great, but it still depends on whether you can make it to the homepage. Can long-form content really make money? It still feels like luck. Comment interactions are broken... So I have to change all my previous strategies. This adjustment isn't friendly at all to small creators. If topic interactions are no longer effective, how much effort will it take to stand out?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 01-17 07:25

Doubling income sounds great, but these tactics change too quickly, I can't keep up. Now the veteran creators in the comment section have to change their strategies; relying solely on interaction is simply not enough. Long-form content is the way to go? Feels like we're going back to the era of competing for time. Relying on homepage recommendations? Difficult, it's no different from playing the lottery. Speaking of the platform's approach, mid-tier creators are caught in the middle, it's really uncomfortable. The review standards have been upgraded, it feels like the threshold is getting higher and higher. Paying members' viewing time becoming a metric—this logic is quite upsetting. So, only in-depth creation can make money? Then I guess I need to reposition myself. This wave of adjustments feels like it's forcing everyone to produce long videos.

View OriginalReply0