Currently, financial institutions are enthusiastic about embracing blockchain, but they face two hurdles—privacy protection and regulatory compliance. These seemingly contradictory demands are attracting a group of projects focused on solving this pain point.



From a technical architecture perspective, traditional public blockchains often implement privacy solutions as after-the-fact remedies, but Dusk Network has made a different choice from the ground up. It is not stacking features on existing infrastructure but directly building a Layer-1 blockchain with a clear goal—tailored for confidential finance.

How is this achieved? It relies on three core elements. First is confidential smart contracts, which use cryptographic techniques like zero-knowledge proofs to keep transaction data encrypted during execution, only revealing verification results on-chain. This satisfies transparency requirements while maintaining privacy boundaries. Second is an innovative consensus mechanism design, adopting Byzantine protocol frameworks to achieve high throughput and low latency under decentralized security—crucial for high-frequency trading institutions. The third, and most interesting, is that compliance is directly woven into the protocol layer, allowing native integration of standard financial tools like KYC and AML, significantly reducing onboarding costs for institutional users.

From an ecosystem perspective, the token of this chain is not just a medium of exchange but a value hub for the entire privacy finance ecosystem. It supports multiple functions including network security, governance participation, and application incentives. As more institutions begin handling sensitive financial data on-chain, the demand for such solutions will become increasingly urgent.
DUSK-3,08%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MemecoinTradervip
· 01-20 03:57
ngl the compliance layer narrative is lowkey the real psyops play here... watch institutions dump this into their portfolios and suddenly everyone's talking about "institutional-grade privacy" as if it's not just another regulatory capture scheme lmao
Reply0
OnchainHolmesvip
· 01-20 03:48
Privacy + compliance combo is indeed powerful, but I still want to see Dusk's actual adoption rate data with real money.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocityTraumavip
· 01-19 16:38
Oh wow, Dusk's approach is indeed quite interesting, considering privacy and compliance from the ground up, unlike some projects that just fudge things.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperervip
· 01-18 05:12
Privacy + compliance combo is indeed perfect, but very few projects can truly be implemented. --- Zero-knowledge proof sounds great, but will institutions really buy into it? Or does it ultimately still depend on regulatory approval? --- Native integration of KYC at the protocol layer is a clever idea, saving a lot of trouble with adapters. --- It's nice to call it privacy finance, but frankly, it's still struggling to survive in the gaps. --- Tokens as a value hub? I've heard that term quite a bit, but how much volume it can actually support remains to be seen.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketmanvip
· 01-17 07:51
Zero-knowledge proof infrastructure, this launch window is quite meticulous. Institutional-grade privacy + compliance encoding, a real breakthrough in the Bollinger Band channel.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdropvip
· 01-17 07:47
Privacy + compliance is indeed a current pain point, but Dusk's approach of solving it from the ground up is quite interesting, unlike other projects that only patch on top. Zero-knowledge proof technology is quite complex, and the key is whether it can truly be implemented for institutional use, which is not easy. However, integrating KYC/AML into the protocol layer still depends on how effectively it is executed...
View OriginalReply0
ForkMongervip
· 01-17 07:47
nah, baking compliance into the protocol layer is just governance theater waiting for its attack vector. once institutional money flows in, the real question becomes—who controls the compliance oracle? that's where the margin of disruption actually lives.
Reply0
StillBuyingTheDipvip
· 01-17 07:45
Privacy + compliance is indeed an institutional-level necessity, but whether the Dusk approach can truly be implemented depends on the subsequent ecosystem development.
View OriginalReply0
fren.ethvip
· 01-17 07:42
Privacy + compliance is really a false proposition; these two are inherently contradictory.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-3824aa38vip
· 01-17 07:31
Privacy + compliance is indeed a tough combo, and Dusk's approach is quite interesting. Handling it directly at the core is much more reliable than patching it afterward. The zero-knowledge proof system is well-executed, so institutions really don't need to worry so much anymore.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)