Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Throughout the evolution of cryptocurrency, few cases have sparked such widespread discussion as the mixer controversy—covering privacy rights, developer responsibilities, regulatory boundaries, and even the legal protection of open-source code. This is not just a technical story; it is a microcosm of the collision between Web3 innovation and anti-money laundering enforcement.
**What is a mixer?**
Simply put, a mixer is a privacy tool for cryptocurrencies. It operates on EVM-compatible blockchains like Ethereum, using zero-knowledge proof technology to enable anonymous transactions. Users deposit funds into a "pool," the protocol shuffles the source of funds, and then allows you to withdraw an equivalent amount from a different address—thus hiding the transaction trail, somewhat like cash transactions in the real world.
**Origin and design philosophy of the project**
In 2019, three Russian-origin developers—Roman Storm, Roman Semenov, and Alexey Pertsev—founded this project. Most importantly, in May 2020, they permanently relinquished control of the protocol through a "trustless setup ceremony." Once this ceremony was completed, the smart contract became immutable, unchangeable by anyone, including the founders themselves. The original intention was to create a truly decentralized system, but this choice later became the focal point of legal disputes.
**Why has it become a controversy?**
The U.S. government alleges that the protocol was used to launder over $7 billion. The most famous case involved North Korean hacker group Lazarus, which stole $455 million in a security breach and laundered the funds through this tool. This raises a dilemma: a system that is technically fully decentralized and where developers have relinquished control—who should be responsible for its misuse? The developers? The users? Or does the technology itself inherently not deserve to exist?
The balance between privacy tools and anti-money laundering enforcement has always been one of the most sensitive topics in the crypto ecosystem.