2026-01-17 07:28:13

There is an old problem in the Web3 world: privacy protection and regulatory compliance seem to always be at odds. On one hand, protecting user data from leaks; on the other, passing compliance reviews—there is indeed a trade-off.

But technology is advancing. A Layer1 project focused on this area uses zero-knowledge proof technology to create a "programmable privacy" infrastructure for scenarios like DeFi, NFT, DAO, and more. The core logic is clear: developers can freely set which data is visible to whom, and user assets and identity information are only accessible to the owner and authorized parties. This not only blocks potential data leaks but also naturally meets global financial regulatory requirements. As a result, compliance concerns during project deployment are eliminated.

Performance metrics are also impressive. Mainnet TPS has surpassed 3000, and gas fees are reduced to about 1/20 of Ethereum’s. In terms of ecosystem, over 50 significant projects have already gathered, and it continues to attract developers, showing a clear growth trend. The token, serving as network fuel and governance credential, has considerable potential as the ecosystem becomes more active.

If you are optimistic about privacy-focused Web3, this type of infrastructure project is definitely worth paying attention to. Early positioning in a promising track often allows for capturing more opportunities.

ETH-1,93%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LuckyHashValue

· 01-19 20:06

Zero-knowledge proofs sound pretty amazing, but how many of them are actually practical?

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerForever

· 01-19 10:25

Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but how many projects can actually implement privacy + compliance in practice? I see a lot of hype and conceptual talk...

View OriginalReply0

CommunityWorker

· 01-19 03:02

Zero-knowledge proofs are truly exceptional; they have forcefully broken the deadlock between privacy and compliance.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-17 07:53

Zero-knowledge proofs are back again, claiming to solve the contradiction between privacy and compliance every time. But what’s the result? TPS 3000, Gas fees 1/20 of Ethereum—these numbers sound so familiar... I’ve heard them too many times. There are 50 projects in the ecosystem, which sounds like a lot, but how many are actually running their businesses? Or are they all just waiting for the token price to rise?

View OriginalReply0

TeaTimeTrader

· 01-17 07:48

Zero-knowledge proofs sound great, combining privacy and compliance in one, but can it really be implemented? It seems like every project is claiming to balance privacy and regulation, but in the end, what happens? TPS over 3000 is indeed impressive, but are the 50 projects in the ecosystem truly active or just empty shells piling up data? Early-stage deployment sounds attractive, but how small can the risks of these infrastructure projects really be? Between the ideals and reality of zero-knowledge proofs, how many project corpses are standing in between? I like the concept of programmable privacy, but I worry it might just be a technical concept with limited practical application. Low gas fees are a good thing, but will developers really come just for cheaper costs? There are too many Layer1s; why will this one survive until the end? The privacy track is indeed exciting, but I’ll wait and see if there are real business scenarios before making any judgments.

View OriginalReply0

Blockblind

· 01-17 07:42

Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed unavoidable, but very few projects that can truly be implemented are truly impressive. Breaking 3000 TPS sounds great, but ecosystem vitality is the real indicator. 50 projects sound very impressive. Do privacy and compliance have to be mutually exclusive? It seems many people are still dreaming. Early-stage deployment has been discussed for so many years; those that were going to fail already have. The concept of programmable privacy is good, but I'm afraid it's just another PPT project.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 01-17 07:36

Zero-knowledge proofs really pack a punch, but it depends on how it’s implemented in practice. Privacy + compliance should have been taken seriously long ago, but 3000 TPS sounds impressive, and the Gas fees are indeed attractive. Over 50 projects in the ecosystem? Interesting, but it depends on the scale of each. Token's potential? Let's first look at the real needs of users, and not just another vapor project.

View OriginalReply0

zkNoob

· 01-17 07:34

Zero-knowledge proofs are truly elegant; they instantly resolve the contradiction between privacy and compliance. I love this approach.

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 01-17 07:33

Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but it feels like they just combine privacy and regulation in a clever way. Gas fees can be reduced to 1/20; if these numbers are real, it should have taken off long ago... why is the buzz so small? Over 50 projects sound like a lot, but how many are truly substantial and meaningful? Most are just empty projects filling the count. Privacy tracks are indeed popular, but there are too many of these L1s; it depends on who can survive until the end. Token's potential is high, but the premise is that the ecosystem can really become active. Right now, it's all PPT (PowerPoint presentations) over reality.

View OriginalReply0