2026-01-17 07:28:34

I recently came across some interesting data: Bitcoin's weekly net inflow reached $168 million, indicating a substantial amount of capital. At the same time, I noticed that some institutions are adjusting their positions due to quantum computing risks, which creates a notable contrast.

From the current market situation, BTC is trading around $95,194, with the RSI reading at 48.9, in the middle range, suggesting that both bulls and bears are still testing each other. There are several key technical points to watch: support remains at $93,290, resistance upward is at $97,097, and the $96,621 level can be seen as an important breakout point for a central pivot.

The long-term threat of quantum computing to cryptocurrencies does exist, but in the short term, on-chain capital movements still point to a positive outlook. Currently, market sentiment remains rational. If we can effectively break through the $96,621 threshold, the upward potential will be unlocked.

From a trading perspective, a relatively conservative approach is to maintain existing positions. Once the price stabilizes above $96,621, consider increasing positions gradually. At the same time, set a stop-loss—if support drops below $93,290, exit to prevent emotional trading and losses.

The coordination of supply-side data and capital flow, combined with the current technical pattern, provides quite sufficient reasons for short-term bullishness. However, the long-term threat of quantum computing remains a Damocles sword that requires ongoing attention. What are your thoughts on this market?

BTC6,16%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LayerZeroHero

· 01-20 07:27

$168 million sounds impressive, but there are institutions running away fearing quantum computing... That's the part I can't understand, haha. Wait, if it breaks 96,621, can it fly? Feels like another scythe position. Quantum computing has been hanging over us for so long, when will it really cut down... We're still just talking about it on paper. Stop loss at 93,290, can this line of defense hold? Anyway, I'm scared.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeePhobia

· 01-20 06:29

1.68 billion net inflow sounds good, but I’m still a bit worried about quantum computing... Why do these two things not match up? Are institutions really starting to worry, or are they just creating panic to buy the dip? Will the 96621 level really determine the future trend? I’m still observing. Is the threat of quantum computing really that close? It feels like this kind of statement appears every year. Setting stop-loss at 93290 is a bit tight, feels like it’s easy to get knocked out. This current sentiment is too rational, which feels a bit off, everything is so flat. 1.68 billion inflow but RSI is still in the middle, indicating insufficient upward momentum. The threat of quantum computing is long-term valid, but it hasn’t really exploded yet, so let’s play short-term first. This analysis is quite standard, just not sure if there will be another black swan event tomorrow. Will breaking the 96621 level really open up upward space? I don’t think so, it might just be a trap to lure more. Holding positions at this level, if it breaks 93290, just exit. No problem, but nothing special either. Quantum computing is always used to scare people. When will it truly threaten encryption?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-17 07:55

168 million net inflow sounds like a lot, but institutions are still hesitant and adjusting their positions. What does this mean? Is quantum computing really that terrifying, or is it just another hype concept? You need to stand firm at the 96621 level, or you'll be back to square one. Just hold steady and avoid over-trading yourself. The market looks rational, but I always feel there's an undercurrent surging beneath.

View OriginalReply0

GasBandit

· 01-17 07:55

1. $168 million net inflow sounds good, but the fact that institutions are fleeing due to quantum risks really can't be sustained, right? The promised bullish outlook. 2. Can the 96621 barrier be broken? It feels like it's just a repeated test; the bulls aren't that determined. 3. The threat of quantum computing is a long-term issue, but right now it's mostly hype. 4. Stop loss if it breaks below 93290; it's easy to say but who can really do it in real trading? Hands tremble during big drops. 5. Positive capital flow expectations? But it looks like big players are still selling; data can be deceptive. 6. This wave of market movement feels like institutions are shaking out, retail investors are repeatedly educated, so I’ll just wait and see. 7. RSI at 48.9 in the middle, indicating nothing is certain. Building a position now is indeed a bit of a gamble. 8. The Sword of Damocles hangs overhead; who dares to hold a heavy position? I think reducing holdings is the better choice.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 01-17 07:43

1.68 billion net inflow looks good, but with quantum computing suddenly rebalancing, I still feel a bit uneasy. Anyway, it's stuck at 96621, can't go up or down, so it's boring. As for the risk of quantum computing, it's actually institutions looking for excuses for themselves. If it was really coming, it would have already arrived. The suggestion to stop loss at 93290 is actually reliable, much more dependable than those shouting about a surge every day. Let's wait for a breakout; right now, it's a time-consuming game.

View OriginalReply0