2026-01-17 07:33:49

When building a sovereign L1 on Tanssi, the Gas mechanism becomes a protocol-level decision. Developers can flexibly choose what the Gas token is, enable gasless on-chain experiences to lower the barrier for new users, provide fee subsidies for specific operations, or even design application-specific fee logic. These Gas strategies are not determined by the consensus layer but are enforced at the runtime layer, giving the application layer unprecedented autonomy. This design allows each application chain to optimize its economic model based on its own ecosystem needs, rather than being constrained by the general L1 Gas market.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BagHolderTillRetire

· 01-20 07:26

Gas-free experience is truly amazing, reducing the startup cost of new projects by half, and no longer being held back by mainnet Gas prices.

View OriginalReply0

SerLiquidated

· 01-19 16:25

This is the level of freedom I wanted. I finally don't have to be held hostage by Ethereum's gas fees roller coaster.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-19 14:42

The no-Gas chain is truly amazing, this way new user experience will directly take off.

View OriginalReply0

blockBoy

· 01-19 07:02

Honestly, if this thing really gets implemented, that would be awesome. No more being tortured by Ethereum's Gas market; setting your own rules? Developers can take off directly.

View OriginalReply0

StrawberryIce

· 01-17 08:01

Really, Tanssi's gas design offers developers a lot of room for imagination. While a no-gas chain experience can indeed lower the barrier for new users, the key still depends on who can truly implement the economic model effectively.

View OriginalReply0

MEVVictimAlliance

· 01-17 08:01

It seems that Tanssi has delegated Gas authority to developers, which is quite bold. However, if each chain operates its own economic model independently, could it actually be more vulnerable to exploitation?

View OriginalReply0

SignatureCollector

· 01-17 07:53

This is true freedom. The Gas mechanism is no longer a dictatorship at the consensus layer, and developers can finally have the final say.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-cff9c776

· 01-17 07:50

This is the true spirit of Web3 decentralization. Developers finally no longer have to be hostage to the gas market. Looking at the supply and demand curve, how much productivity can this unleash?

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 01-17 07:49

From a code perspective, the runtime layer's enforcement of this Gas logic is indeed clever... It is worth noting that this design shifts the MEV risk onto the application chain itself, and unsurprisingly, someone will exploit this.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 01-17 07:36

I've already said it, Gas fees are the shackles of L1. Tanssi has directly loosened the restrictions for developers... Really, a no-Gas experience is the way to go for newcomers. Who would want to be discouraged by vampire-like fees?

View OriginalReply0