2026-01-17 07:34:00

Stablecoin payment applications have always been an important direction for blockchain adoption. Recently, a dedicated settlement layer public chain built specifically for USDT has shown impressive performance. Through zero-fee transfers and EVM compatibility, it has made significant breakthroughs in this track.

A few data points make this clear: since its official launch, this chain has processed over 75 million transactions. The stablecoin supply has surpassed $7 billion, indicating that the ecosystem is truly gaining users. Even more interestingly, it has become the second-largest market on Aave, which demonstrates strong lending demand.

The tokenomics design is also worth noting. The project allocates 40% of the total tokens directly into ecosystem incentives to support liquidity pools and developers. Such incentive mechanisms can indeed attract participants, and it's no surprise that the token price has performed well recently as the ecosystem takes shape.

From wallet integration to regional expansion, this chain is methodically advancing its ecosystem layout. The Asia-Pacific prioritized strategy also reflects the project's thoughtful market considerations. To establish a foothold in the stablecoin track, technical capabilities alone are not enough; ecosystem operation and user accumulation are essential. The project's progress is gradually validating this approach.

AAVE-3,67%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnlyOnMainnet

· 01-20 06:13

A stablecoin volume of 7 billion USD is indeed impressive. However, the key still depends on whether it can truly retain users; no matter how much incentive is given, it’s all for nothing.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 01-20 03:33

Zero-fee transfers sound great, but very few projects can actually survive. Is the $7 billion stablecoin supply figure real? I have my doubts. Aave's second-largest market? Feels a bit exaggerated, let's look at the data again. 40% of tokens are used for incentives, isn't that just another way to cut the leeks? The Asia-Pacific first strategy is good, at least it's doing things steadily and reliably, unlike some other chains. With 75 million transactions, what does the daily active user count look like when averaged out? What's the real traffic? With so many chains in the stablecoin sector, it feels like they're all telling the same story. In the end, you need technology + operations + funding; this project seems to have a slight advantage. Zero-fee transactions—are they subsidizing themselves? Sustainability is questionable.

View OriginalReply0

MrDecoder

· 01-18 02:28

Zero fees sound a bit too good to be true... but the 7 billion stablecoin volume is indeed impressive. Honestly, the data showing Aave as the second-largest market is the real game-changer, indicating that people are actually using it.

View OriginalReply0

AlgoAlchemist

· 01-17 08:03

Zero fees are a bit of a joke. It's not that there are truly no costs; they've just shifted the costs elsewhere. I'm already tired of this trick.

View OriginalReply0

PerennialLeek

· 01-17 08:02

Zero fees? Now that's the right way. Other chains are still out there cutting leeks. --- 70 billion stablecoin supply indicates that people are indeed using it, unlike some projects that just shout slogans. --- Aave's second-largest market is quite telling; the demand for lending and borrowing is really strong. --- 40% of tokens are allocated to ecosystem incentives. That's a bold move, but whether it can be implemented depends on the follow-up. --- I think the Asia-Pacific priority strategy is a good move; this is truly a blue ocean. --- 750 million transactions sound like a lot, but we need to ask how the daily active users are doing. --- Token prices are rising along with the ecosystem, which makes sense logically. --- Expanding from wallet endpoints to regional expansion sounds quite orderly, but operational capability is the real test. --- Is the stablecoin track competitive? It seems like lately everyone is just trying to see who has the lowest transaction fees. --- If the technology isn't enough, you have to rely on ecosystem operations. There's nothing wrong with that statement.

View OriginalReply0

ApeShotFirst

· 01-17 07:56

Wow, zero-fee transfers? This is the coolest thing I've heard. 700 million stablecoin supply... Why didn't I get on board earlier? Aave's second-largest market, this data is pretty impressive.

View OriginalReply0

GhostChainLoyalist

· 01-17 07:54

Zero fees are truly unbeatable, but to be honest, ecosystem operation is really the key to winning.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropJunkie

· 01-17 07:51

Zero fees? That's what players want. Can it really work? Wait, Aave's second-largest market? These numbers are impressive. 40% ecological incentives directly invested. I've seen this approach before, but it seems to be working. The Asia-Pacific priority strategy is quite clever. Understands the market.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaskVictim

· 01-17 07:40

Zero fees? Wait, is that true? Then where did the transaction fees go? A stablecoin supply of 7 billion USD sounds impressive, but how is the ecosystem depth? Aave's second-largest market... does Arbitrum have to step aside? Honestly, allocating 40% of tokens to ecosystem incentives isn't a bad idea; it just depends on how long it can sustain. Asia-Pacific first? Another round of regional competition?

View OriginalReply0