Speaking of recently promising projects, the Lit token in the DEX perpetual contract sector is worth paying attention to. Interestingly, this protocol initially chose to restrict withdrawals, and there are quite deep considerations behind this decision.



First point: the project team understands that in the early stages, it will definitely attract a large number of liquidity mining participants. The characteristics of these participants are very clear—they come for the profits and follow the trend. If withdrawals were open from the start, this group would inevitably cash out their profits, causing a dump, and the dumping price would be pushed down infinitely by them. Restricting withdrawals is actually a way to protect external liquidity from being destroyed.

The second point is even more interesting: it artificially creates the illusion of a "one-sided market." This can attract speculative capital to flood in, as they want to follow the trend and buy in, naturally pushing up the token price. The price rally at this stage also lays the foundation for subsequent ecosystem development.

Now that withdrawals are gradually opening up, it’s actually a signal—external funds can enter more confidently, without worrying about being crushed at the peak. This is good news for those who truly believe in the project, as the authenticity of liquidity has been verified.

Another practical consideration: if the token price continues to decline, how will the subsequent plans like S3 be promoted? Users will accelerate their exit, which would be truly counterproductive. From this perspective, the team actually holds a lot of主动权 (initiative) in pushing up the token price at the current position. Whether from the perspective of ecosystem health or economic incentives, there are strong reasons to drive the price upward.
LIT-11,65%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockBargainHuntervip
· 01-18 12:00
It sounds like a carefully designed process to harvest retail investors. No matter how eloquently it's described, it doesn't change this fundamental nature.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenievip
· 01-17 16:19
Basically, it's just the same old trick of cutting leeks with new tricks.
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDayvip
· 01-17 08:55
Restricting withdrawals is indeed a tough move, just to prevent retail investors from dumping. Oh my God, this logic is brilliant, it's like teasing before dropping? This idea from Lit is quite interesting, it feels like playing psychological warfare. But the problem is, after withdrawals are opened, will it drop straight away... Wait, isn't this just the usual move of the big players?
View OriginalReply0
FrontRunFightervip
· 01-17 08:50
ngl this is just textbook market manipulation wrapped in fancy language... they literally admitted to fabricating false scarcity to pump the bags. "single-sided illusion" lmao that's just dressing up the dark forest in protocol clothing
Reply0
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 01-17 08:48
Alright, I've heard this spiel many times before, it's just "restricting withdrawals to protect you." Dumping to protect liquidity? Ha, honestly, it's just fear of people fleeing. Now opening withdrawals is considered a positive signal? That logic is a bit hard to buy, buddy.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMOvip
· 01-17 08:47
Restricting withdrawals is just locking funds to trap retail investors, isn't it? Sounds so nice...
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretfulvip
· 01-17 08:41
Wait, restricting withdrawals is to protect liquidity? It seems more like leaving arbitrage room for your own people.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin