Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Many new chains claim to be "institution-friendly," but once it comes to practical implementation, their true nature is revealed: wallet modifications, browser changes, a multitude of settlement process explanations. Developers and exchanges get stuck on the hurdle of customization and adaptation, and in the end, what they lose is not just technology, but time and costs.
Dusk's approach is different. It breaks down the network architecture into three layers—DuskDS handles consensus, data availability, and settlement; DuskEVM is responsible for standard EVM execution; and there is a dedicated privacy execution layer, DuskVM. The biggest advantage of this design is that developers can deploy directly using the Ethereum toolchain, with compliance and settlement logic already "built-in" at the bottom layer, eliminating the need to reinvent the wheel.
Unlike traditional L2 solutions, Dusk is not just a simple wrapper. The team has ported EIP-4844 and the Optimism execution layer, but the final settlement still occurs on DuskDS. The key point is that DuskDS has a built-in MIPS pre-validator to check state transitions, which means transaction settlement shifts from the traditional Optimism model of "waiting 7 days for challenge windows" to a near-instant speed—this is a critical threshold for institutional applications. Moving from "a few hours to days" directly to "almost real-time" is the difference between usability and impracticality.
No wonder the official team has set the mainnet launch of DuskEVM as a key milestone in January. The data is compelling: deep integration on a custom L1 could take 6 to 12 months and cost up to 50 times more than deploying a standard EVM; using the EVM standard toolchain, much of the work can be completed within weeks. For teams working on compliant DeFi or RWA, this time difference is a matter of life and death.
$DUSK's design is also more streamlined—one token covers three layers of the ecosystem: used for staking, governance, and settlement on DuskDS; as gas and transaction fees on DuskEVM; and in the future, supporting privacy applications on DuskVM.
From the user perspective, prepare some $DUSK in advance for gas fees, and familiarize yourself with the native bridge usage; from a narrative standpoint, the key indicator is whether, after the launch of DuskEVM, the platform can run the first batch of truly compliant applications and transactions with an "Ethereum-like experience." If successful, the value of $DUSK will no longer rely on self-promotion but will be validated by on-chain activity itself.