What makes Fogo so fast? That's a question many people ask. As an L1 public chain, its performance report is indeed impressive—136,000 TPS throughput and 40 milliseconds block time, which is rare among similar projects.
On the technical level, Fogo adopts a customized Firedancer client architecture, allowing it to achieve institutional-level operational efficiency and extremely low transaction latency. What does such performance mean for high-frequency traders and the DeFi ecosystem? It means lower costs, smoother experience, and greater arbitrage opportunities.
And compared to Solana? Each of the two L1s has its own characteristics, with Fogo taking different paths in speed and latency. Want to delve deeper into Fogo's underlying logic, airdrop mechanism, and its position in the public chain competition? A systematic review and comparative analysis will give you a clearer understanding.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SolidityJester
· 6h ago
136000 TPS sounds impressive, but I don't know if it can handle real transaction volume. The theoretical data is far from practical performance.
View OriginalReply0
MevShadowranger
· 17h ago
136000 TPS sounds impressive, but can it really be used in practice? Doubtful.
Firedancer architecture is hyped up so much; is it just on paper?
Solana has been through so many ups and downs; why should Fogo stay stable?
Low cost and smooth experience... let's wait for mainnet data before making judgments.
Is there a big arbitrage opportunity? That depends on whether there's real liquidity flowing in the ecosystem.
Airdrop mechanisms are back again—new tricks to cut leeks?
Speed depends on real-world scenarios; anyone can perform well in simulated environments.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWhisperer
· 21h ago
136000 TPS sounds unbelievable, but if it can really stay stable, it will be sky-high.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 21h ago
136000 TPS sounds impressive, but can it really run stably...
---
Firedancer again, is it really more reliable than Sol's approach?
---
Low cost and smooth experience, but the key is the ecosystem. What’s truly usable now?
---
Big arbitrage opportunities? First, you need liquidity, brother.
---
Fogo vs Sol, this game isn't over yet.
---
40 milliseconds block time is shocking, but what about network stability?
---
Institutional-level efficiency, sounds like promotional language during funding.
---
Airdrop mechanism is the real focus, show me quickly.
---
What’s the use of fast speed? The key is having people use it.
---
Is this data from real tests or theoretical estimates? Be clear and transparent.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 21h ago
136000 TPS sounds impressive, but can it really run stably? Don't let it turn out to be just a PPT public chain again.
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurker
· 21h ago
136000 TPS is indeed impressive, but can it really run at full capacity once launched? That's the key question.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapy
· 21h ago
136000 TPS sounds impressive, but can it really stay stable? Or is it just another marketing number?
View OriginalReply0
MrDecoder
· 21h ago
136000 TPS sounds impressive, but the key is whether it can stay stable when actually on the chain.
The Firedancer architecture definitely has some potential, but I wonder if there will be a bunch of issues after the mainnet launches.
Once again hyping up the Solana killer, this script feels so familiar...
By the way, how is the airdrop mechanism designed? Is it still possible to jump in and grab a wave now?
Fast speed is great, but the ecosystem is what truly determines success or failure. No matter how fast the technology, without applications, it’s useless.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 21h ago
136000 TPS sounds impressive, but I want to know how many active users there are now.
What makes Fogo so fast? That's a question many people ask. As an L1 public chain, its performance report is indeed impressive—136,000 TPS throughput and 40 milliseconds block time, which is rare among similar projects.
On the technical level, Fogo adopts a customized Firedancer client architecture, allowing it to achieve institutional-level operational efficiency and extremely low transaction latency. What does such performance mean for high-frequency traders and the DeFi ecosystem? It means lower costs, smoother experience, and greater arbitrage opportunities.
And compared to Solana? Each of the two L1s has its own characteristics, with Fogo taking different paths in speed and latency. Want to delve deeper into Fogo's underlying logic, airdrop mechanism, and its position in the public chain competition? A systematic review and comparative analysis will give you a clearer understanding.