2026-01-17 10:25:36

The recent performance of the hard technology sector is indeed worth paying attention to. Commercial aerospace, innovative semiconductor equipment, CPO—these areas carry grand visions for future industrial upgrades, not just concepts that get hyped for a week or two and then fade away.

There is a cyclical logic behind this: the stock market is used to cultivate and support the hard technology industry, and the development of hard technology, in turn, provides genuine growth drivers for the stock market. This is the healthiest interaction model.

Looking at the non-ferrous metals sector, because of its international pricing power attribute, as long as global inflation expectations remain, it is easy to maintain a slow bull trend. Commercial aerospace, innovative semiconductors, CPO, and non-ferrous metals—these sectors have already laid out a sufficiently broad allocation framework for investors. Instead of adding seven or eight weak sectors, it’s better to master these main themes.

Of course, this is just a perspective and does not constitute investment advice.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NeverVoteOnDAO

· 01-20 03:39

Hard technology this time is truly different. It's not about cutting leeks, but genuinely paving the way for the future. Focusing on a few main lines is indeed more comfortable than shooting randomly. I agree with this logic. Inflation is here, and commodities are a reassurance. This cyclical theory is spot on.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoGoldmine

· 01-20 01:41

The main lines of hard technology are indeed solid, but to be honest, it still depends on who can turn computing power into actual returns, which is the real indicator. Focusing limited funds on high ROI tracks is much smarter than blindly expanding. Well said, but the key still lies in execution. Most people get stuck on persistence. I agree with this logic; cyclical feedback is the key to sustainability. The prerequisite is having enough technical reserves to support it. The international pricing power in the non-ferrous metals sector is indeed a stubborn holdout. As long as inflation persists, don't expect it to drop.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSqueezer

· 01-17 10:54

Hard technology truly is different; this time it's not just concept hype. Exactly, the cyclical logic is the real key. Aerospace chips and non-ferrous metals—aren't these the ones worth mastering thoroughly? Why add unnecessary drama? As long as inflation persists, investing in non-ferrous metals makes sense; this logic is sound. Instead of spreading out, focusing is better; I agree.

View OriginalReply0

SpeakWithHatOn

· 01-17 10:43

Hard technology is indeed attractive, but don't be fooled by funding groups sticking together. Take your time and watch carefully.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractDiver

· 01-17 10:37

Hard technology is truly different; this time it's not the usual trap of cutting leeks. Mastering a few main lines is much better than casting a wide net—it's that simple. Can I still get on the CPO train now? Feels a bit late. I'm optimistic about non-ferrous metals; global inflation won't die down in the short term. Aerospace and semiconductor equipment—these are the real future bets. Brilliant, the stock market supports industry, and industry supports the stock market. I believe in this logic. Weak sectors should indeed be avoided; focusing firepower is the way to win. I'm a bit worried about policy changes in commercial aerospace.

View OriginalReply0

PositionPhobia

· 01-17 10:37

Hard technology this time is really not a routine of cutting leeks; there is a real industrial logic backing it. Things like aerospace chips have a ten-year start; you need to take it slow. The four-piece set of non-ferrous metals + hard technology is enough; don't blindly add positions. The cyclical logic is indeed comfortable—stock market supports industry, and industry then bounces back to support the stock market. Does CPO still have a chance now? Feels a bit euphoric. Instead of sticking to these main lines, it's better to first understand your risk tolerance. Hard technology is the right direction; the question is when to get on board and how much. If inflation expectations still exist, the non-ferrous metals shield must be kept. It sounds good, but actually it’s just about focusing firepower and not messing around. This investment approach is much clearer than most people who are just blindly messing around.

View OriginalReply0

MemeKingNFT

· 01-17 10:28

I mentioned this wave of hard technology long ago. When the NFT crash happened last year, I was already studying on-chain data. At that time, I realized that the physical industry is the long-term narrative... The commercial aerospace sector really reflects the rise and fall of the mainland. Just a year or two ago, it was overlooked, and now it suddenly became the main trend? This is what it means to go with the flow.

View OriginalReply0