Looking at this Wall Street political farce, it truly is the most absurd plot twist of the year—those who wanted to overthrow Powell ended up pushing his "iron-blooded persona" into the history books. U.S. stocks stabilized, and the U.S. Treasury yield curve flattened, with the market giving the clearest answer through candlestick charts.

The irony lies here: the Congress members who loudly called for impeachment were ultimately countered by public opinion, failing to produce substantial evidence and appearing quite awkward; the originally hopeful dovish faction within the Federal Reserve, trying to cater to political demands, was suddenly branded as "untrustworthy" by the market. Political manipulation has completely backfired this time.

The essence of the matter is simple: global capital treats the central bank's "stress resistance" as a ballast for the market. The louder the political noise, the more precious the central bank's independent decision-making becomes. Those still dreaming of pressuring through public opinion to force a rate cut should wake up.

After the farce ends, the new rules are clear: when political interference hits the central bank's red line, the market's premium on "policy stability" soars—safe-haven assets like gold become even more popular, and even those growth stocks previously seen as high-risk are supported by valuation due to expectations of "the Fed's unwavering stance." In the short term, the central bank will undoubtedly become more hawkish, but this is not out of petulance; it’s a firm stance to reassure the market.

Stop expecting politics to directly influence interest rates. "Trust + firmness" is the new main theme. How do you see this reversal affecting the triangular relationship between the central bank, policies, and the market? How do you think the central bank should balance independence and accountability? Share your thoughts in the comments.