2026-01-17 10:32:14

The development of the project ecosystem relies on the coordinated advancement across multiple dimensions. The activity level of the online community determines the project's popularity and cohesion, as members exchange ideas and share insights during discussions. Simultaneous collaborative efforts turn community members from mere spectators into active participants and builders. Meanwhile, offline promotion brings the project from the virtual space into reality, allowing more people to understand and recognize it. These three components are indispensable and complement each other, forming genuine community consensus and ecological vitality for the project.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

27 Likes

Reward
27
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

mev_me_maybe

· 01-20 04:40

Words are one thing, but how many projects are really putting effort into offline activities now --- Online hype is plentiful, but offline execution is the real key --- Community activity, to put it plainly, is driven by profit --- Offline promotion costs money, most projects are reluctant to spend --- Good grief, another set of theories, but what about reality? --- This line of reasoning isn't wrong, the key is who actually follows through --- I just want to know when certain projects will finally move from virtual to real life

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyLemur

· 01-19 02:01

That's correct, but the problem is that most projects directly fail in offline promotion.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedAgain

· 01-17 12:17

Sounds good, but the three projects I lost money on were all hyped up like this too... Explosive online activity, queues at offline meetups, and what happened? As soon as the lending rate went up, they started running away. --- Sounds perfect, but unfortunately I've seen too many "ecosystem collaborations" end up turning into "collective liquidation." --- Got all three dimensions right? I just want to ask how many projects really do it instead of just talking about it? --- It's the same old story... Community building is just for show, right now I only trust the collateralization rate and liquidation mechanism of tokens to be reliable. --- Last year, I was fooled by this kind of "community consensus" and went all in. Now I'm still topping up my positions. If only I had known earlier, everyone. --- Offline promotion to pump the market, online communities to catch the falling knives—I'm all too familiar with this cycle... Almost got liquidated again every time. --- Talking all fancy, but without risk control points, I don't believe in the vitality of an ecosystem at all.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter420

· 01-17 11:02

Talking about ecosystem consensus every day, but the key is to have real financial incentives; otherwise, an active community is pointless.

View OriginalReply0

StealthMoon

· 01-17 11:02

The community needs to be lively and substantial; it can't just be online chatting. We need real money and silver to come out for activities.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullSurvivor

· 01-17 11:02

Alright, here we go again with the same old clichés... Everyone understands the concept of combining online and offline, but the key question is, how many projects actually accomplish it? Most of it is just community chatter, offline events end in failure, and then it's just a one-stop run-away... Speaking of participants and builders, those words sound nice, but when it comes to cutting the leeks, didn't we think of ourselves? Sounds good, but isn't it just about who has the money to pour into marketing... Community consensus? Ha, you can tell it's all fake just by a price drop. Wait, isn't this set of theories something every project team has said at least once?

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotBot

· 01-17 11:02

Community activity is praised, but how many projects can truly be implemented? Most are just tricks to harvest profits from newcomers.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPunster

· 01-17 11:00

Online heated discussions, offline real money, and finally everyone losing everything—this is called ecosystem vitality? --- Three-dimensional coordination? Basically, it's about fear of people leaving, tricking them online to go offline. --- Community consensus? That’s everyone betting their entire assets, sharing both glory and loss—that kind of consensus. --- Wait, is this logic about "participants" or "bagholders"? I always feel something's off. --- I understand offline promotion—it's about pulling the leeks from the screen to the现场 to cut, significantly improving efficiency. --- From virtual space to real space, the distance to wallet arrival is really close. --- Laughing as you lose this round, as long as the community activity is high enough, the lost money can be considered an "ecosystem contribution," right?

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 01-17 10:55

This rhetoric sounds very nice, but have you checked the fund flow of large accounts promoting offline? I have been monitoring several institutional addresses, and there are frequent anomalies. --- Community consensus? Ha, let's wait until I finish tracking those large transfers, it feels like someone is orchestrating this rhythm behind the scenes. --- Online popularity is highly correlated with interactions from whale wallet clusters. I have compiled on-chain evidence; data doesn't lie... --- It's the old story of "three essential links," but the question is, who is controlling the pace of these three links? --- Just saw a suspicious address transfer out 5000 coins at dawn, and then the community's popularity suddenly surged? Coincidence, everyone? --- No matter how good the hype, it can't hide the truth behind the backend data. I have already set up monitoring alerts.

View OriginalReply0

ETHReserveBank

· 01-17 10:53

That's correct, but the reality is that most projects' offline presence is basically just for show, and online, it still depends on those few top influencers to set the tone.

View OriginalReply0