2026-01-17 10:32:48

Stablecoins are extremely popular, but it's easy to say—trying to get businesses on-chain for transfers? That's a different story.

Retail investors use U transfers for convenience and speed, but are listed companies daring to do the same? A million-dollar transaction on-chain, with all data transparent—competitors can directly see your cash flow and gross profit margin—what is this called? This is called "all your cards are on the table." From a business perspective, this is an absolute minefield.

That's why this is the real problem Dusk aims to solve. The confidential payment scheme it develops has a straightforward core logic: companies can perform large-scale fund transfers on-chain, while using zero-knowledge proofs to hide transaction amounts and counterparty identities. But this isn't true anonymity— the system retains an "audit key" for compliance parties to review.

Look at this design: it combines the confidentiality of cash with the compliance requirements of banks. This dual approach to payments is the prerequisite for B2B to truly migrate to blockchain. Frankly, privacy payments here are not something to hide but a standard for protecting corporate trade secrets. Looking at this trillion-dollar payment market, the track is enormous.

DUSK1,15%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

EthSandwichHero

· 01-20 04:20

This is the real deal. Privacy does not equal illegal activity. Why should competitors be able to see a company's wallet ledger?

View OriginalReply0

retroactive_airdrop

· 01-20 01:46

Alright, this is the real way to get to the core of the problem. Large companies indeed don't dare to fully decentralize everything on-chain, but the Dusk approach actually solves practical issues.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 01-18 06:53

Haha, finally someone hit the nail on the head. Companies simply don't dare to go fully transparent. Privacy payments are indeed a necessity; otherwise, publicly listed companies might as well not be on the chain at all. The design of zero-knowledge proofs combined with an audit key is really quite clever. The track is indeed large, but can Dusk make it out... By the way, how many companies are really considering on-chain B2B transfers now? Just the compliance hurdle alone can kill a bunch of projects.

View OriginalReply0

ForumLurker

· 01-17 10:58

Wow, finally someone has pointed out this pain point. B2B is stuck because of privacy issues. Looking at transparent ledgers now could scare a bunch of CFOs to death.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractDiver

· 01-17 10:58

Amazing, finally someone has spoken out—privacy payments are truly the essential demand for enterprise-level applications. Dusk's approach is indeed brilliant; the set of audit keys really strikes a perfect balance. Speaking of which, there aren't many listed companies willing to take the plunge now. This logic should have been implemented long ago; I've been waiting for this solution so long that I'm exhausted. Why hasn't anyone thought of applying zero-knowledge proofs to B2B payments... No, it's not that no one thought of it, but no one dares to push it. The current question is who will be the first to use it. Once a benchmark case appears, this will explode. It's called privacy payments in a nice way; in a harsh way, it's about competitors not being able to see through you. But isn't that exactly what enterprises are eager for? This is true market understanding—it's not about hiding dirt, but simply protecting oneself. Compared to those boastful privacy coin projects, Dusk really has something.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-a606bf0c

· 01-17 10:52

Wow, someone finally hit the nail on the head. Public companies really don't dare to play with transparent chains.

View OriginalReply0

NftMetaversePainter

· 01-17 10:47

actually, the algorithmic elegance of zero-knowledge proofs here is what intrigues me—it's like watching cryptographic poetry unfold in real-time, tbh

Reply0

DeFi_Dad_Jokes

· 01-17 10:47

Haha, this is truly understanding the pain points of enterprises. Privacy isn't about money laundering; it's about protecting trade secrets.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_ptsd

· 01-17 10:46

Haha, finally someone is talking about this. Retail investors playing around is fine, but it's really outrageous for listed companies to actually dare to use it. I agree with the idea of Dusk; privacy + compliance are indeed necessary for enterprises, but the zero-knowledge proof system is still too abstract for ordinary people. Privacy payments are either something that can't see the light or just common business sense. By the way, can this trillion-dollar market really be divided... The day enterprises truly go on-chain might still be far off; that wall of traditional finance isn't that easy to break down.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSweaterFan

· 01-17 10:34

Wow, this is the right way. The combination of zero-knowledge proofs and audit keys is both private and compliant. Enterprises finally have a reason to go on-chain.

View OriginalReply0